Teams

Kyle/JB/AP

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring League 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 · 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-26vs Chandler/JB/APWon 31
W#1 DoublesCory Kyle / John Koch vs Reginald Chandler / Jacob Sanders6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJacob Cunningham / Steven Matthews vs Jameson McFadden / Chase Myers6-3, 6-0
L#2 SinglesRichard Daniel vs Hunter Eaves2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrad Popejoy / Jonathan Phillips vs Matthew Mitchener / Ericson Bacsa6-4, 7-6
2025-04-30vs Chandler/JB/APWon 40
W#1 DoublesJacob Cunningham / Brad Popejoy vs Jonathan Halford / Michael Brooks7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesNapoleon Davis vs Hunter Eaves6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChris Evins / John Koch vs Chase Myers / William Chamberlin7-5, 6-4
W#2 SinglesCory Kyle vs Jameson McFadden6-0, 6-0
2025-04-23vs McGee/JB/APWon 50
W#1 DoublesDylan Vance / Preston Million vs Emanuel Mcgee / Michael McEuen6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJohn Koch vs Alex Camp6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRichard Daniel / Andrew Dallas vs Jacob Reeves / Kevin Berry6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCory Kyle vs Andrew Nadzam6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBrad Popejoy / Jonathan Phillips vs Tevin McGee / James Riles6-2, 6-3
2025-03-27vs McGee/JB/APWon 40
W#1 SinglesChris Evins vs Jason Davis4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJacob Cunningham / Andrew Dallas vs Jacob Reeves / Kevin Berry6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNapoleon Davis vs Alex Camp6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSteven Matthews / Richard Daniel vs Tevin McGee / Andrew Shoffner6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Cory Kyle
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Richard Daniel
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Andrew Dallas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Chris Evins
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.93
Brad Popejoy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jacob Cunningham
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
John Koch
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Napoleon Davis
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Preston Million
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cory Kyle
14W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
3.46
Richard Daniel
26W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Andrew Dallas
12W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Chris Evins
26W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Brad Popejoy
12W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.93
Jacob Cunningham
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
John Koch
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Napoleon Davis
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Preston Million
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.