Teams

NLetts-UNC

2026 Eno River Mixed 40 & Over · 40 & Over Mixed 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-29vs SGraff.40.3.0-DURWon 20
W#1 DoublesLindsey Gouker / Josh Gouker - (DQ) vs Matthew Feldt / Sara Lawrence3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMeng Chen / Vera Halpern vs Leslie Jackson / Terrence Hawkins6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2026-07-22vs AHabib-HRLost 12
L#1 DoublesLindsey Gouker / Josh Gouker - (DQ) vs Connie Brown / James Bowers6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJulia Haslett / Tim Turner vs Karen Sonders / Ashraf Habib2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMia Pizzagalli / Meng Chen vs Michelle Koeneke / BRIAN KING7-6, 6-4
2026-07-15vs JYoung.40-DURWon 21
W#1 DoublesVera Halpern / Nathan Letts vs Carl Laird / Pamela Howell-Davis6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulia Haslett / Tony Perucci vs Bill Schaller / Susan Parent1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesScott Whitt / Sara Knechtel vs Chris Petree / Annaliese Gresham7-5, 6-0
2026-07-08vs LGilchrist-CHCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesLindsey Gouker / Josh Gouker - (DQ) vs Aaron Meadows / Jessica Meadows4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Andrew / Tim Turner vs Kara Andrews / Nathan Andrews6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMia Pizzagalli / Nathan Letts vs Lucy Leach / Tom Porter4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-01vs TEdwards-HSWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulia Haslett / Adam Hantman vs Mary Macdonald / Dave Thomas6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLisa Andrew / Scott Whitt vs Tynita Edwards / Reggie Oakley7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSara Knechtel / Tony Perucci vs Linda Nagelhout / DAVID DELINSKY6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2026-06-24vs MBland-CHTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Andrew / Tim Turner vs Maribeth Hamilton / John Hess4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesVera Halpern / Brett Bushnell vs Elizabeth Enderline / CHARLES ENDERLINE6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMia Pizzagalli / Tony Perucci vs Tracy Kinsey / Mark Bland3-6, 1-6
2026-06-17vs YDeaver-DURWon 30
W#1 DoublesVera Halpern / Adam Hantman vs Ann Laros / Adrian Laros6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Andrew / Meng Chen vs Tammy Hood / Lloyd Calhoun6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSara Knechtel / Tim Turner vs Effie Jefferson / Alvaro del Carpio6-2, 6-4
2026-06-10vs SGraff.40.3.0-DURLost 12
W#1 DoublesJulia Haslett / Christopher Fioretti vs Matthew Feldt / Abigail Weaver6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMia Pizzagalli / Meng Chen vs Tom Luben / Susan Graff5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSara Knechtel / Brett Bushnell vs Rafael DeJesus / Kinsey Wennerstrom6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Mixed 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Josh Gouker
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.95
Meng Chen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
2.92
Julia Haslett
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Christopher Fioretti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Adam Hantman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Lindsey Gouker
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.80
Vera Halpern
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.79
Lisa Andrew
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.76
Brett Bushnell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Mia Pizzagalli
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.68
Sara Knechtel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Tim Turner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.42
Tony Perucci
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.39
Scott Whitt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Nathan Letts
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vera Halpern + Meng Chen3249% gamesnot enough data
Lindsey Gouker + Josh Gouker1447% gamesnot enough data
Julia Haslett + Christopher Fioretti314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Josh Gouker
6W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.11
Meng Chen
14W–11L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Julia Haslett
48W–55L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Christopher Fioretti
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Adam Hantman
11W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Lindsey Gouker
24W–41L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Vera Halpern
18W–26L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Lisa Andrew
13W–19L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Brett Bushnell
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
Mia Pizzagalli
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Sara Knechtel
44W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
Tim Turner
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.62
Tony Perucci
3W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.42
Scott Whitt
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.39
Nathan Letts
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.