Teams

YMCA:Lade:Sullivan

2022 NH Adult 18 & Over Women Weekend · Diva 3.5

2 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-01-22vs MTS:Goolbis:ValeriLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmanda Lade-Sullivan / Andrea Sullivan vs Sharon Goolbis / Kimberly Valeri6-8
2022-01-22vs GB:King:PrettetWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmanda Lade-Sullivan / Andrea Sullivan vs Christina King / Rebecca Pettet8-2
2021-12-05vs SC:MacriLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmanda Lade-Sullivan / JOLENE JOHNSON vs Angela Carter / Susan MacRi1-6, 5-7
2021-11-21vs GB:French:KingLost 01
L#3 DoublesPatrice Ruff-Burbine / Andrea Sullivan vs Andrea Grenier / Rebecca Pettet4-6, 2-6
2021-11-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesPatrice Ruff-Burbine / Andrea Sullivan vs Susan Maloney / Alison Robie6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2021-11-07vs GB:French:StoneWon 10
W#2 DoublesSandra Jean / Amanda Lade-Sullivan vs Laura Stone / Molly French7-5, 6-4
2021-11-07vs MTS:Goolbis:ValeriWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Mosle / Andrea Sullivan vs Sharon Goolbis / Kimberly Valeri6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2021-10-24Lost 01
L#3 DoublesIlsiya Khasanova / Amanda Lade-Sullivan vs Ann Strachan / Alison Robie6-7, 2-6
2021-10-03vs MTS:Goolbis:ValeriLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarrie Fontaine / Amanda Lade-Sullivan vs Sharon Goolbis / Kimberly Valeri4-6, 2-6
2021-10-03vs SC:MacriLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnnette Kirby / Andrea Sullivan vs Susan MacRi / Cynthia Godin2-6, 3-6
2021-09-19vs YMCA:RadkeLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmanda Lade-Sullivan / Carrie Fontaine vs Andrea Sullivan / Jennifer Mosle6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · Diva 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1YMCA:Murray:Neal202003
2EXE:Correnti:O'Meara2020012
3YMCA:Fontaine:Czerw202008
4EXE:Hersey:Maye202008
5LNH:Race:Howell202001
6YMCA:Johnson:Gardner1111111
7GB:French:Stone1111113
8YMCA:Lade:Sullivan1111110
9GB:King:Prettet1111113
10MTS:Goolbis:Valeri1111114
11LNH:BunnyRabbits:Carlin:Manfield111119
12YMCA:Zeeben:Hincks1111114
13EXE:Tatro:Maye1111112
14LNH:Prout:Vietry0202216
15MTS:Gould:Klein0202216
16GB:LaFreniere:Lovejoy0202216
17GB:Merida:Gootee0202216

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Amanda Lade-Sullivan
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Andrea Sullivan
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Lade-Sullivan + Andrea Sullivan3354% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Lade-Sullivan
26W–26L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Andrea Sullivan
15W–14L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.