Teams

Chandler

2025 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-02-20vs Ramachandran/FolleseWon 31
W#1 DoublesTed Kisner / Daniel Hosker vs Aaron McCants / Arun Mehta6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Finn / Curtis Chandler vs Daniel Poppy / Alan Yousha6-0, 6-4
L#2 SinglesCharles House vs Lance Gauer3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJiameng Zhou / Mark Koplin vs Nilakantan Mahadevan / Harish Ramachandran6-0, 6-3
2025-01-30vs KalugdanLost 23
L#1 DoublesAnthony Schroer / Ram Rajagopalan vs Nate Hanes / Joseph Kalugdan6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDaniel Hosker vs Elias Ramirez2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJiameng Zhou / Ted Kisner vs Ramces Francisco / Edward Rainier Santos4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesDineth Altmann vs Ricardo Zarate6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichael Finn / David Kemp vs Rodolfo Dy / Andrew Heal6-2, 7-5
2025-01-23vs TRETTEL W25Lost 13
L#1 DoublesCharles House / Dineth Altmann vs Jeff Johnson / Josh Kasendorf4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAnthony Schroer vs Anthony Trettel6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCurtis Chandler / David Kemp vs Nicolei Nasrabadi / John Thumser6-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJiameng Zhou vs Zachary Johnson0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Dineth Altmann
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.99
David Kemp
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.96
Anthony Schroer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.77
Mark Koplin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Curtis Chandler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Charles House
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Daniel Hosker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.72
Ram Rajagopalan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Michael Finn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jiameng Zhou
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ted Kisner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ram Rajagopalan + Curtis Chandler0530% games−0.9% vs expected
David Kemp + Curtis Chandler213 matchesnot enough data
Curtis Chandler + Anthony Schroer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dineth Altmann
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.14
3
David Kemp
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Anthony Schroer
18W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Mark Koplin
8W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Curtis Chandler
17W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Charles House
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Daniel Hosker
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
Ram Rajagopalan
7W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
Michael Finn
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
Jiameng Zhou
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ted Kisner
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.