Teams

DToomey/ASauls(OPRC)

2025 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-17vs HPhelps/AMitchell (Bridgehampton)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesChristina McWilliams / Krista Wainscott vs Cyndi Sheeler / Allison Mitchell5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnne Sauls / Elizabeth Hall vs HEATHER PHELPS / Allison Misson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMary Kay Deering vs Stephanie Fung6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesValorie Ake / Elizabeth Smart vs Lisa Laws / Ashley Bowles5-7, 4-6
2025-04-14vs AConger (OPRC)Split 11
W#2 SinglesMargy Pettit vs Carrie Bode6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesValorie Ake / Suzy Johnson vs Jenny Duncan / Ellen Smith6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-04-03vs SSmulktis (Rama)Split 22
L#1 DoublesGinger Daly / Mary Kay Deering vs Katherine Costello / Mallory Miller3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Margulis / Christina McWilliams vs Danielle Conrad / Sarah Smulktis6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJenny Havens vs Jessica Abrams6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGabi Gorelick / Anne Sauls vs Julie Grahl / Amy Bundrick7-6, 6-4
2025-03-31vs MShuford/CJensen (OPRC)Won 40
W#1 DoublesKrista Wainscott / Christina McWilliams vs Kate Wagner / Tara Croom6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSuzy Johnson / Valorie Ake vs Jennifer Danesis / Hala Webster6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJenny Havens vs Nicole Woodley6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Margulis / Ginger Daly vs Laura Brown / Erin Lentz6-3, 6-4
2025-03-17vs AMcLaughlin (Lifetime)Won 20
W#1 DoublesMary Kay Deering / Gabi Gorelick vs Stacey Reinhardt / Anna McLaughlin6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJenny Havens vs Hila Johnson6-2, 6-2
2025-03-17vs AHart/MPaterson (Springfield)Won 30
W#1 SinglesMargy Pettit vs Pam Harris6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMary Kay Deering vs Debra Schwede7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Smart / Valorie Ake vs Amy Wiethoff / Barbara Moysaenko6-3, 6-4
2025-03-03vs AStein (Ballantyne CC)Won 40
W#1 DoublesAnne Sauls / Gabi Gorelick vs Ami Stein / Patti Zakow6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Kay Deering / Ginger Daly vs Kimberly Guth / Jennifer Ison7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMargy Pettit vs Michelle Lynch6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKrista Wainscott / Jennifer Margulis vs Wendy Lutgring / Kandi Jackson6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Liz Ostrow
published
4.18
Christi Hart
published 4.5
4.04
Gabi Gorelick
published
3.93
3.91
Suzy Johnson
published
3.88
Ginger Daly
published
3.77
Mary Kay Deering
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.76
Krista Wainscott
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Jenny Havens
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.74
Elizabeth Smart
published
3.73
Valorie Ake
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.73
Elizabeth Hall
published
3.72
Jennifer Margulis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Margy Pettit
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.55
Anne Sauls
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.43
Deborah Toomey
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Toomey + Anne Sauls12262% games−0.7% vs expected
Deborah Toomey + Krista Wainscott12156% games−0.9% vs expected
Mary Kay Deering + Jennifer Margulis5457% gamesnot enough data
Mary Kay Deering + Valorie Ake5352% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Margulis + Krista Wainscott5254% gamesnot enough data
Mary Kay Deering + Anne Sauls4258% gamesnot enough data
Mary Kay Deering + Krista Wainscott5152% gamesnot enough data
Anne Sauls + Krista Wainscott3259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Liz Ostrow
18W–4L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Christi Hart
7W–20L career · type D · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
Gabi Gorelick
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
4.04
4
Christina McWilliams
26W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
Suzy Johnson
35W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
Ginger Daly
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.88
Mary Kay Deering
105W–58L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Krista Wainscott
188W–89L career · 9 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Jenny Havens
77W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Elizabeth Smart
15W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Valorie Ake
67W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Elizabeth Hall
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Jennifer Margulis
77W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.72
4
Margy Pettit
51W–73L career · 3 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Anne Sauls
81W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Deborah Toomey
125W–65L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.