Teams

MC GREEN

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-29vs BP REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrett Gedvilas / Adam Kemp vs Michael Gomez / Eric Huelson3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJules Perryman / Paul Gruszecki vs Tony Delacruz / Dave Klene6-2, 6-2
2024-05-22vs BVP NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrett Gedvilas / Adam Kemp vs Ari Krichiver / Andy MacQueen4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJules Perryman / Rohit Bhattacharya vs Brian Farnell / Steven Seybold2-6, 2-6
2024-05-15vs NJ GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlbert Downs / Brett Gedvilas vs Thomas DelaFuente / Albert Eng3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesPaul Gruszecki / Jules Perryman vs Matthew Field / Alexander Manwaring7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2024-05-08vs MC NAVYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrett Gedvilas / Adam Kemp vs Brett Vladika / Jarret Sutphin2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPaul Gruszecki / Jules Perryman vs Charles Sprague / Andrew Pine6-3, 6-1
2024-04-24vs BP REDLost 01
L#3 DoublesAdam Kemp / Brett Gedvilas vs Dave Klene / Michael Richmond3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2024-04-17vs BVP NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesAdam Kemp / Brett Gedvilas vs Ari Krichiver / Andy MacQueen4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Albert Downs
published 4
3.72
Brett Gedvilas
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.56
Adam Kemp
published 4
3.56
Paul Gruszecki
published
3.25
Jules Perryman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Lorne Fultonberg
published
Rohit Bhattacharya
published
Spencer Winstanley
published
Steven Yi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adam Kemp + Brett Gedvilas3350% games+8.6% vs expected
Brett Gedvilas + Jules Perryman2342% gamesnot enough data
Paul Gruszecki + Jules Perryman134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Albert Downs
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Brett Gedvilas
27W–42L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Adam Kemp
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
Paul Gruszecki
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Jules Perryman
12W–32L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Lorne Fultonberg
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rohit Bhattacharya
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Spencer Winstanley
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Steven Yi
2W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.