Teams

Love at First Serve/Smith/Balboa

2026 Team Singles 18+ SFV Winter · Spring

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 SinglesKiska Higgs vs Christine Whigham1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDana Marterella vs Jennifer Williams0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesCindy Clauss vs Marah Hogendorn2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesDalia Sedra vs Deborah Anderson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesDana Marterella vs Salisa Wagner1-6, 4-6
2026-03-29Lost 01
L#3 SinglesDalia Sedra vs Deborah Anderson3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesErica Cruickshank vs September Ryken6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesVictoria O Seni vs TANIA JANICEK1-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesVictoria O Seni vs Jennifer Orwin4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCindy Clauss vs Lindsey Stoneman4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesErica Cruickshank vs Christine Whigham6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesDalia Sedra vs Salisa Wagner2-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesCindy Clauss vs Marah Hogendorn4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Paseo Avengers/Ryken/Valencia High School6115616152
2Love at First Serve/Smith/Balboa1661534220

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Leslie Vastano
published 3.5
3.37
Cindy Clauss
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Erica Cruickshank
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Kiska Higgs
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.20
Penny Zhang
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.16
Holly Metts
published 3.5
3.10
Victoria O Seni
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.07
Gabrielle Shrier
published 3.5
3.04
Venita Ryan
published 3
2.94
2.93
Dalia Sedra
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.84
Dana Marterella
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Venita Ryan + Leslie Vastano4156% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Leslie Vastano
86W–73L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Cindy Clauss
14W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Erica Cruickshank
15W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
3.37
Kiska Higgs
6W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Penny Zhang
51W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.20
3.5
Holly Metts
10W–19L career · type S · no lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
Victoria O Seni
5W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Gabrielle Shrier
14W–9L career · no lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Venita Ryan
128W–97L career · no lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Amber Calhoun-berger
21W–14L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
3.5
Dalia Sedra
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.93
3
Dana Marterella
6W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.