Teams

SSelig-HVCC

2026 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Men Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-29vs JMontague-DURLost 12
L#1 SinglesBryson Powell vs Andrew Burd0-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesAlex Herzick vs Jeeka Karnas6-4, 6-3
L#3 SinglesEthan Holston vs Pradeep Hariharan2-6, 2-6
2026-06-22vs APineda-CHTCLost 01
L#2 SinglesAlex Herzick vs Will Lassiter1-6, 5-7
2026-06-15vs JLundberg-DURLost 01
L#2 SinglesPaul Klenk vs Christopher Green1-6, 0-6
2026-06-08vs APineda-CHTCLost 02
L#2 SinglesAndrew Sheldon vs Stephen Stark2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesSean Selig vs Jonathan Ryan2-6, 2-6
2026-06-01vs JMontague-DURSplit 11
L#2 SinglesJustin Nixon vs Nikita Poujai4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 SinglesAndrew Sheldon vs Pradeep Hariharan6-4, 7-5
2026-05-18vs RBerliner-DURSplit 11
L#2 SinglesSean Selig vs Mark Scherr2-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesAlex Herzick vs Ryan Berliner4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-05-11vs JByrd-DURLost 03
L#1 SinglesBryson Powell vs Hyunseong Ahn0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesEthan Holston vs Tevin Wilson1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesPaul Klenk vs Matthew Frazer2-6, 1-6
2026-05-04vs JLundberg-DURSplit 11
L#2 SinglesBryson Powell vs Christopher Green5-7, 0-6
W#3 SinglesEthan Holston vs Daniel Allen6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Men Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SSelig-HVCC1771736248

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Justin Nixon
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.72
Bryson Powell
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.70
Andrew Sheldon
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.59
Alex Herzick
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.52
Sean Selig
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.42
Paul Klenk
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.22
Ethan Holston
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justin Nixon + Alex Herzick5157% games+4.8% vs expected
Bryson Powell + Justin Nixon4159% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Justin Nixon
43W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.89
4
Bryson Powell
7W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Andrew Sheldon
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Alex Herzick
23W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.59
Sean Selig
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.52
Paul Klenk
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Ethan Holston
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.