Teams

BC-PalosVerdesTC/KarenKredel

2022 Mixed 18 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Mixed 18 & Over - 9.0

21 players · average NTRP 4.44 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Mixed 18 & Over - 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.66
Jennifer Beindorf
published
4.57
4.49
Erica Smalley
published 4.5
4.33
Andrew Chekian
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.31
Jennifer Uyeda
published
4.31
Kelly Kenney
published
Ashley Saccoccio
published 4.5
Gayle Hollenbaugh
published 4.5
4.22
Joshua Chou
published
4.20
Kurt Kredel
published
4.15
Mayu Kawamura
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.15
Scottie Tucker
published
4.00
Melanie Archer
published
3.86
Gabriel Ambruso
published 4.5
3.78
Loyd Villanueva
published 4
3.68
Karen Kredel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Robert Mullarkey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Jonathan Lane
published
Jay Gardner
published
Jerome Haig
published
Ken Shoji
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Chekian + Erica Smalley314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Beindorf
15W–7L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.66
5
Christopher Kenney
2W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
4.57
4.5
Erica Smalley
109W–64L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
4.49
4.5
Andrew Chekian
111W–64L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
4.33
Jennifer Uyeda
3W–9L career · no lines in 2022
93%7%<1%
4.31
Kelly Kenney
10W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Ashley Saccoccio
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Gayle Hollenbaugh
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joshua Chou
14W–9L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.22
Kurt Kredel
13W–6L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Mayu Kawamura
64W–69L career · 5 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.15
Scottie Tucker
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
Melanie Archer
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
4.00
4.5
Gabriel Ambruso
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
86%14%<1%
3.86
4
Loyd Villanueva
29W–38L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Karen Kredel
42W–57L career · 1 line in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Robert Mullarkey
48W–59L career · 1 line in 2022
73%27%<1%
3.42
Jonathan Lane
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%20%80%
3.11
Jay Gardner
2W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jerome Haig
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ken Shoji
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.