Teams

GJTC KKILLIAN

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - WS · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - WS

5 players · average NTRP 3.30 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-09-19vs GJTC LSMITHWon 10
W#2 DoublesCurt Hansen / Lorenz Ramseyer vs Ronald Engler / Dusty Campbell6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2023-09-14vs GJTC JWENDTLost 01
L#2 DoublesKeith Killian / Braden Kappius vs John Wendt / Greg Anoia2-6, 4-6
2023-09-12vs GJTC SHALLSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLorenz Ramseyer / Dan Oliver vs Craig Smith / John Rhoads7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKeith Killian / Seth Ritchey vs Rex Zerr / Stephen Kurtenbach2-6, 2-6
2023-08-31vs GJTC BFELDHAUSLost 02
L#1 DoublesKevin McGuinness / Lorenz Ramseyer vs David Fife / David Pacini1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKeith Killian / Seth Ritchey vs Christopher Cutsforth / Scott Powell0-6, 1-6
2023-08-29vs GJTC LSMITHWon 10
W#2 DoublesSeth Ritchey / Braden Kappius vs James Corbett / Dusty Campbell6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-22vs GJTC JWENDTLost 01
L#2 DoublesBraden Kappius / Lorenz Ramseyer vs Greg Anoia / Andrew Nolan2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-08-15Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKeith Killian / Seth Ritchey vs Stephen Kurtenbach / Rex Zerr5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2023-08-01vs GJTC BFELDHAUSLost 01
L#2 DoublesBraden Kappius / Dan Oliver vs David Pacini / Christopher Cutsforth3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Braden Kappius
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Lorenz Ramseyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Seth Ritchey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.79
Keith Killian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Dan Oliver
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keith Killian + Lorenz Ramseyer2738% games−3.3% vs expected
Seth Ritchey + Keith Killian1735% gamesnot enough data
Braden Kappius + Seth Ritchey303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Braden Kappius
62W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Lorenz Ramseyer
22W–42L career · 4 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Seth Ritchey
40W–85L career · 4 lines in 2023
20%79%<1%
3.12
3
Keith Killian
40W–109L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Dan Oliver
7W–23L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.