Teams

Smith/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.67 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-06vs Witte/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnna Durante / Melissa Fleenor vs Anna Witte / Chancey Thompson4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesRachel Burford vs Kelly Irvine2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAngela Wood / Niki Shaheen vs Rachel Montague / Caitlin Motte6-3, 6-3
2024-10-30vs Carkeet/MemphisWon 20
W#1 DoublesRachel Burford / Angela Wood vs Mary Margaret Posey / Leigh Lamb6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmber Caggiano / LaTreka Smith vs Kim Badger / Whitney Greer6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-10-23vs Avant/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesMelissa Fleenor / LaTreka Smith vs Catherine Lackie / Lindsey Myers1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJamie Earnest vs Krystal Shaw7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRachel Burford / Angela Wood vs Summer Farmer / Ashley Powers6-1, 6-0
2024-10-16vs Galdieri/MemphisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnna Durante / Melissa Fleenor vs Emily Craven / Jeanne Cannon6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRachel Burford / Niki Shaheen vs Kelly Baker / Bobbie Wonderly McLaughlin7-5, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.42 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.60
Rachel Burford
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Jamie Earnest
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.36
Rachell Wall
published
2.33
Melissa Fleenor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.29
Niki Shaheen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Amber Caggiano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Anna Durante
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
LaTreka Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Nadia Fares
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie Earnest + Rachel Burford2347% gamesnot enough data
Rachell Wall + Melissa Fleenor134 matchesnot enough data
Anna Durante + Melissa Fleenor123 matchesnot enough data
Niki Shaheen + Rachel Burford033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Burford
44W–42L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%22%78%
2.60
3
Jamie Earnest
16W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
Rachell Wall
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.36
Melissa Fleenor
8W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.33
Niki Shaheen
9W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.29
2.5
Amber Caggiano
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Anna Durante
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
LaTreka Smith
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nadia Fares
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.