Teams

IE-Claremont-Cardona

2026 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - IE · IE Men 4.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.86 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 19 8:30 AM
Elevenis
Sep 26 2:00 PM
The Claremont Club
Oct 10 8:30 AM
McDermott Park Sports Complex
2026-08-29vs IE-Elevenis-BolandWon 21
W#1 DoublesThomas Bird / Lionel Yang vs Ryan Tran / Roman Chon6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesStuart Yang / Chad Brantley vs Truong Quach / Spencer Nguyen3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoseph Keeth / Dennis Ho vs Ben Nguyen / Dylan Dart5-7, 3-6
2026-08-15vs IE-Misfits-McDermott Park-WestLost 12
L#1 DoublesRyan Cox / Lionel Yang vs EVAN CHANG / Maki Potes4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRichard Eddy / Shawn ONeill vs Pan Lee / Kevin Sung7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTom Cardona / David Nighbert vs Ehab Ateia / Jason Maslach6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2026-08-08vs IE-Elevenis-BolandWon 20
W#2 DoublesChad Brantley / James Hoffman vs Southideth Phimmasone / Jermaine Waltemeyer7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesBeau Joseph / Tom Cardona vs Phi Ngo / Kevin Dang6-3, 6-2
2026-07-25vs IE-Misfits-McDermott Park-WestWon 20
W#2 DoublesRyan Foran / James Hoffman vs Grant Jape / Gustavo Olmos6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDennis Ho / Joseph Keeth vs Joe Barbuto / Aaron Ramos6-2, 6-3
2026-07-18vs IE-Elevenis-BolandWon 21
L#1 DoublesThomas Bird / Stuart Yang vs Luis Prieto / Quang Tran3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRichard Eddy / James Fidak vs Roman Chon / Brett DeCicco6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJoseph Keeth / Beau Joseph vs Truong Quach / Jaya Krishna Devarapu6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · IE Men 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IE-Claremont-Cardona31751099
2IE-Elevenis-Boland12451076
3IE-Misfits-McDermott Park-West12451282

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Andrew Weisman
published 4.5
4.36
Shawn ONeill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
David Weisman
published 4.5
4.06
Ryan Foran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.01
Lionel Yang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Ryan Cox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
James Fidak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Chad Brantley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Richard Eddy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
James Hoffman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Dennis Ho
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.57
Stuart Yang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.51
Beau Joseph
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Joseph Keeth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Michael Gutierrez
published
3.33
Tom Cardona
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
David Nighbert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Thomas Bird
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Eddy + Ryan Foran8168% games+5.1% vs expected
Beau Joseph + Tom Cardona314 matchesnot enough data
Chad Brantley + James Hoffman404 matchesnot enough data
Ryan Foran + James Hoffman314 matchesnot enough data
Beau Joseph + Stuart Yang123 matchesnot enough data
Beau Joseph + Joseph Keeth213 matchesnot enough data
Dennis Ho + Tom Cardona213 matchesnot enough data
Dennis Ho + Michael Gutierrez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Weisman
2W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
4.43
Shawn ONeill
6W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%1%99%
4.36
4.5
David Weisman
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ryan Foran
15W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%33%67%
4.06
Lionel Yang
7W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
4.01
Ryan Cox
15W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.96
James Fidak
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Chad Brantley
14W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.92
Richard Eddy
18W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.84
James Hoffman
15W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
3.5
Dennis Ho
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.63
Stuart Yang
17W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Beau Joseph
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.51
Joseph Keeth
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
Michael Gutierrez
8W–10L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Tom Cardona
99W–55L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
David Nighbert
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Thomas Bird
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.