Teams

Oaksmith 3.5 18+

2021 Howard-Columbia Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.43 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-06-18vs MacAttack 3.5 18+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesStephanie Ruskin / Kathryn Broadbent vs Laura Haney / Loan Nguyen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKim Neiss / Brenda Crowe vs Kimberly Ford / Stephanie Freeman3-6, 1-2
2021-06-02vs Casual SetsWon 10
W#3 DoublesMonica Targonski / Kim Neiss vs Linda Morris / Pamela Mary Gogol7-6, 6-4
2021-05-22vs Will Play for Chardonnay 3.5 18+Won 10
W#3 DoublesStephanie Ruskin / Gena Conron vs Amy Lamont / Gerrie Bost6-7
2021-05-16Won 10
W#2 SinglesGena Conron vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-05vs Vitamin TLost 01
L#2 DoublesDionne Miller / Gena Conron vs Katie Wolven / Amy Kluckhuhn6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2021-05-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesElisabeth Garcia-Wade / Kim Neiss vs Kim Daniels / Heidi Sung3-6, 3-6
2021-04-26vs Casual SetsLost 01
L#3 DoublesStephanie Ruskin / Jennifer Hendon vs Pamela Mary Gogol / Lisa Greenlee2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-04-16vs Rally Girls 3.5 18+Won 10
W#1 DoublesKathryn Broadbent / Stephanie Ruskin vs Heather Smyth / TRINA CUNNINGHAM6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-03-29Won 10
W#2 DoublesKim Neiss / Stacey Lyons vs Cynthia Alvey / Ellen Millhollon6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Jill Rose
published
3.40
Lorinda Rawlings
published
3.26
3.18
Margaret Asher
published
3.14
Kim Neiss
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Gena Conron
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Sherry Houff
published
3.12
Monica Targonski
published
3.11
Brenda Crowe
published 3.5
3.10
Ashling Pollard
published 3.5
2.94
Elisa Oaksmith
published 3.5
2.70
Stephanie Ruskin
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Ruskin + Gena Conron131348% games−4.2% vs expected
Sherry Houff + Monica Targonski123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Rose
49W–17L career · no lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
3.96
Lorinda Rawlings
10W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Elisabeth Garcia-Wade
9W–5L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
Margaret Asher
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Kim Neiss
40W–62L career · 4 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Gena Conron
86W–123L career · 3 lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.14
Sherry Houff
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
17%82%<1%
3.12
Monica Targonski
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Brenda Crowe
5W–6L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Ashling Pollard
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Elisa Oaksmith
2W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2021
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
Stephanie Ruskin
141W–155L career · 4 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.