Teams

CV-Palm Valley CC/Laura Walker

2024 CV Fall Combo Doubles · CV-Women 6.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.20 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-12-17vs CV-Indian Wells TG/NickersonLost 02
L#1 DoublesNancy B Caudill / Ava Schumacher vs Janette Lyons / Julianna Rose3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJulee Moore / Denise Roethenmund vs Natalie Nofsinger / Elizabeth Hester6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesJulee Moore / Nancy B Caudill vs Sonia Menning / Monica Solis4-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesAva Schumacher / Denise Roethenmund vs Andrea Primer / Lindy Gaylord6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulee Moore / Kathy Schwalbe vs Lorene Peirce / Jessica Inserra3-6, 5-7
2024-11-19vs CV-Indian Wells TG/NickersonLost 01
L#3 DoublesLaura Walker / Diane Macdonald vs Kathy Buller / Shannon McFarlin1-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesKathy Benjamin / Ava Schumacher vs Nina Louie / Jennifer Bouffard6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJulee Moore / Kathy Schwalbe vs Terry Castro-Oistad / Jane LaRue6-2, 6-2
L#1 DoublesDiane Macdonald / Nancy Economopoulos vs Deb Garris / Katherine Misskelley3-6, 3-6
2024-10-29vs CV-Indian Wells TG/NickersonWon 10
W#1 DoublesAva Schumacher / Nancy B Caudill vs Lesley Gagnon / Sherri Nickerson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesKathy Benjamin / Julee Moore vs Ruthanne Rothman / Sonia Menning6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJulee Moore / Kathy Schwalbe vs Christina Cooley / Lorene Peirce3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV-Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Denise Roethenmund
published 3.5
3.21
Diane Macdonald
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Ava Schumacher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.05
Julee Moore
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Nancy Economopoulos
published
2.85
Eileen Martin
published 3
Alisa Sajadi
published 3
Kathy Benjamin
published
Kathy Schwalbe
published
Laura Walker
published
Stella Snethlage
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Roethenmund
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Diane Macdonald
53W–36L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.21
3
Ava Schumacher
32W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.09
Julee Moore
44W–67L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.05
Nancy Economopoulos
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Eileen Martin
6W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Alisa Sajadi
17W–33L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathy Benjamin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathy Schwalbe
5W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Laura Walker
30W–32L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stella Snethlage
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.