Teams

YTC-Yakimaniacs

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 WOMEN

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-03-20vs PC-Down the TLost 12
L#1 DoublesMolly Neal / Jennifer Terami vs Emily McNabb / Erica Bjella1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesErika Mullins vs Margaret Murgor4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDiane Hehir / Judi Harris vs Tiffany Hebdon / Susan Duncan7-6, 6-3
2022-03-19vs PC-Down the TSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRose Longoria / Molly Neal vs Tiffany Hebdon / Mauri Morgan5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDana Lybeck / Erika Mullins vs BECKY MAGNUSON / Margaret Murgor6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2022-03-19vs PC-Down the TSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichelle Russell / Dana Lybeck vs Emily McNabb / Erica Bjella1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJudi Harris / Diane Hehir vs BECKY MAGNUSON / Susan Duncan6-2, 6-2
2022-03-18vs PC-Down the TWon 21
W#1 DoublesJudi Harris / Dana Lybeck vs Tina Duncan / Susan Duncan6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJennifer Terami vs Mauri Morgan6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRose Longoria / Diane Hehir vs BECKY MAGNUSON / Tiffany Hebdon4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GAC-Orgain3112818160
2YTC-Chicks with Sticks3111921157
3YTC-Yakimaniacs22101024180
4PC-Slice Girls 20220481226184

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Jennifer Terami
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Diane Hehir
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Judi Harris
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Rose Longoria
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.43
Erika Mullins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
Dana Lybeck
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erika Mullins + Dana Lybeck0631% games−8.9% vs expected
Erika Mullins + Rose Longoria224 matchesnot enough data
Erika Mullins + Judi Harris044 matchesnot enough data
Diane Hehir + Judi Harris314 matchesnot enough data
Erika Mullins + Jennifer Terami123 matchesnot enough data
Rose Longoria + Jennifer Terami123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jennifer Terami
43W–48L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Diane Hehir
18W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Judi Harris
65W–88L career · 3 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Rose Longoria
26W–36L career · 2 lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
2.50
3
Erika Mullins
26W–56L career · 2 lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
2.43
Dana Lybeck
5W–16L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.