Teams

TOC.Murdock

2025 CTRL Summer Singles 18 & Over · Summer Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.92 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-08-26vs TOC.DoyleWon 10
W#2 SinglesSapna Varkey vs Stefanie Cage6-0, 6-4
2025-08-20vs TOC.SchloemannSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMary Clare Rosemeyer vs Smita Paranjape3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 SinglesLindsay Murdock vs Meghan Rider6-1, 6-2
2025-08-17vs TOC.StegmanWon 10
W#1 SinglesLindsay Murdock vs Shayna Bolton6-4
2025-08-05vs TOC.DoyleWon 10
W#3 SinglesSapna Varkey vs Ellen Libby6-3, 6-1
2025-07-30vs TOC.SchloemannWon 10
W#1 SinglesMary Clare Rosemeyer vs Nancy Pack7-6, 6-1
2025-07-28vs TOC.SchloemannWon 20
W#1 SinglesMary Clare Rosemeyer vs Smita Paranjape7-5, 6-4
W#3 SinglesMariana Lima Gonzalez vs Laura Ross6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-23vs TOC.StegmanWon 10
W#2 SinglesSapna Varkey vs Michaela Brannock6-2, 6-3
2025-06-25vs TOC.StegmanSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMary Clare Rosemeyer vs Lindsay Castret2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMariana Lima Gonzalez vs Michaela Brannock0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-06-18vs TOC.DoyleSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMary Clare Rosemeyer vs Trang Huynh6-3, 7-5
L#3 SinglesSapna Varkey vs Tori Sutler7-6, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Sapna Varkey
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
4.03
Mary Clare Rosemeyer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
4.01
Lindsay Murdock
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.97
Caroline Yu
published 4
3.92
Erin Farleigh
published
3.74
Lorraine Hall
published
3.70
Liz Chen
published
3.60
Mariana Lima Gonzalez
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
3.55
Anna Kooper
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Farleigh + Lindsay Murdock134 matchesnot enough data
Erin Farleigh + Mary Clare Rosemeyer224 matchesnot enough data
Sapna Varkey + Lindsay Murdock314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sapna Varkey
81W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
4.04
4
Mary Clare Rosemeyer
122W–43L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
4.03
4
Lindsay Murdock
149W–61L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Caroline Yu
17W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.97
Erin Farleigh
17W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.92
Lorraine Hall
50W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.74
Liz Chen
22W–8L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Mariana Lima Gonzalez
128W–73L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Anna Kooper
25W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.