Teams

CDTA W 40&OW3.0 4.Lake Bluff Sherman Sat 4 $22

CDTA Winter 40 & Over W · E

24 players · average NTRP 3.00 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-04Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKim Vandegrift / Jude Sharp vs Michelle Charles / Michelle Michaels1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNancy Fitzgerald / Karen Kos vs Shannyn Smith / Prabha Parameswaran3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Gottshall / Lana Aleynikova vs Carolyn Driscoll / Paula Casas6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJean Niemi / Lana Aleynikova vs Anna Klemm / Jan James-Calvert7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Fitzgerald / Laura Breakstone vs Karin Steinbrueck / Michelle Molna6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Kos / Julie Gottshall vs Karen Accattato / Jenifer McCartney6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W 40&OW3.0 2.MT Chi Brown-1 Sun 6 $31.5120361227297
2CDTA W 40&OW3.0 4.Lake Bluff Sherman Sat 4 $2293321637299
3CDTA W 40&OW3.0 5.River Trails Cox Sun 6 $2484351331297
4CDTA W 40&OW3.0 1.MT Bann Shappert Sun 4 $2775272146391
5CDTA W 40&OW3.0 3.MT Chi Brown-2 Sun 2 $31.548173164440
6CDTA W 40&OW3.0 7.Heritage Werts Sat 4 $24210103879513
7CDTA W 40&OW3.0 6.Centennial Steinbrueck Sun 5 $20012113778505

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Nicole Koleno
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.04
Laura Breakstone
published 3
3.01
Maribeth Corbett
published 3
3.00
Juli Theo
published 3
2.96
Meg Hui
published 3
2.91
Kim Vandegrift
published 3
2.90
2.90
Elham Abboud
published 3
2.90
Samantha Garrity
published 3
2.80
Pamela Sherman
published 3
2.80
Julie Bell
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.79
Jean Niemi
published 3
2.77
Jamie Rauscher
published 3
2.76
Karen Kos
published 3
2.76
Jude Sharp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Julie Gottshall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Michelle Frankovich
published
2.71
Jennifer Scroggins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.61
Margaret Keane
published
Jenna Stanley
published
Kristin MacCarthy
published
Lana Aleynikova
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Gordon
published
Nancy Fitzgerald
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elham Abboud + Juli Theo7168% games+16.5% vs expected
Jennifer Scroggins + Jenna Stanley7353% games+12.5% vs expected
Samantha Garrity + Laura Breakstone12262% games+10.5% vs expected
Samantha Garrity + Jennifer Scroggins7066% games+9.8% vs expected
Laura Breakstone + Julie Bell10461% games+9.6% vs expected
Maribeth Corbett + Julie Bell9753% games+7.8% vs expected
Elham Abboud + Jennifer Scroggins2456% games+6.6% vs expected
Juli Theo + Maribeth Corbett13760% games+4.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicole Koleno
57W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.10
3
Laura Breakstone
78W–37L career · no lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Maribeth Corbett
52W–35L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Juli Theo
76W–49L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Meg Hui
71W–58L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Kim Vandegrift
71W–69L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Amanda Marijanovic
61W–41L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
Elham Abboud
76W–37L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.90
3
Samantha Garrity
78W–56L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.90
3
Pamela Sherman
71W–54L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.80
Julie Bell
40W–30L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Jean Niemi
41W–43L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Jamie Rauscher
45W–33L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Karen Kos
37W–38L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
Jude Sharp
28W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Julie Gottshall
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Michelle Frankovich
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
Jennifer Scroggins
35W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Margaret Keane
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
2.61
Jenna Stanley
32W–23L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristin MacCarthy
25W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lana Aleynikova
15W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Gordon
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Fitzgerald
16W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.