Teams

6 RVA Williamson Gentlemen

2021 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Men · Richmond Adult 55 & Over Men 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-08-23vs 3 ACAC KochWon 10
W#1 DoublesRichard Bland / Brad Williamson vs Randolph Moore / Thomas Wilson6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2021-07-27vs 8 MAC Haynes / SturmWon 10
W#1 DoublesRichard Bland / Tom Foster vs Cecil Newton / Bruce Fraley6-1, 6-0
2021-07-20vs 1 Westwood Over Hill Gang FraserWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrad Williamson / Richard Bland vs Frank Payne / Gregg Gammon6-4, 6-4
2021-07-13vs 4 Burkwood StewartWon 20
W#1 DoublesRichard Bland / Tom Foster vs Mike Davis / Craig Matthews6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesFrank Mason / Brad Williamson vs Richard Bohrer / Joseph Golden2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-06-22vs 7 Raintree Campbell 7.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesRichard Bland / Tom Foster vs William Seidel / Stuart Dowdy6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPaul Haley / Brad Williamson vs Edward Scherer / William Bryan3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 55 & Over Men 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Robert Calhoun
published
3.33
Terence Blackwood
published
3.33
Brad Williamson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Richard Bland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Jeffrey Foddrell
published
3.26
Paul Haley
published
3.17
Joseph Cipolla
published
3.15
Frank Mason
published 3.5
2.83
Gary Woods
published 3
2.81
Kim Boys
published
Tom Foster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brad Williamson + Richard Bland241253% games+0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Calhoun
28W–15L career · no lines in 2021
<1%44%56%
3.52
Terence Blackwood
22W–22L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Brad Williamson
176W–167L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Richard Bland
251W–138L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
Jeffrey Foddrell
9W–7L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
Paul Haley
30W–34L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
Joseph Cipolla
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Frank Mason
6W–13L career · no lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
3.15
3
Gary Woods
6W–19L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
2.83
Kim Boys
2W–11L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.81
Tom Foster
11W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.