Teams

Chicks with Sticks

2024 Montgomery Adult Other Winter Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-21vs Maryland MadnessWon 10
W#1 DoublesGillian Moorhead / Cindee Smith vs Denise Weinig / Holly Rasmussen7-6, 5-4
2024-02-22vs Aspen Hill Hot ShotsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAngela Ferguson / Cindee Smith vs JULIENNE EBONGUE / Darcie Hammer3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-02-14vs Smart AcesWon 10
W#2 DoublesGillian Moorhead / Joanne Rome vs Maggie Sullivan / Sara Franklin6-2, 6-1
2024-01-25vs Love All 3.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesKaroline Shannon / Cindee Smith vs Meaghan Curry / Carrie Wofford6-4, 6-3
2024-01-15vs Anything But NetWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnne Christman / Gillian Moorhead vs Susan Kiernan / Anabela Puhl5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-01-10vs FunTennisWon 10
W#2 DoublesGillian Moorhead / Cindee Smith vs Amy Peterson / Chrystal Goonewardene6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Cindee Smith
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.34
Jody Amann
published
3.33
Desiree Nichtula
published 3.5
3.33
Nancy Cooper
published
3.32
Gillian Moorhead
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.26
Karoline Shannon
published
Anne Christman
published 3.5
3.25
Patricia Rose
published
3.12
Joanne Rome
published
3.11
Jayne Korolkoff
published
3.06
Angela Ferguson
published 3.5
3.05
Lisa Raker
published
Kristen Moshyedi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gillian Moorhead + Cindee Smith213 matchesnot enough data
Jayne Korolkoff + Joanne Rome123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cindee Smith
49W–38L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
Jody Amann
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Desiree Nichtula
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
Nancy Cooper
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Gillian Moorhead
168W–147L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Karoline Shannon
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Anne Christman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Rose
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.25
Joanne Rome
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
3.12
Jayne Korolkoff
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Angela Ferguson
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.06
Lisa Raker
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
Kristen Moshyedi
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.