Teams

Freeman - Mixed 40s 3.0 Wed

2024 Piedmont Mixed 40 & Over · 3.0 Mixed Dbls Wed PM

15 players · average NTRP 3.28 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-07-17vs Billings - Mixed 40s 3.0 Wed.Won 10
W#3 DoublesTravis Beeson / Blythe Murphy vs Steve Billings / Laura Ambler6-3, 6-4
2024-06-12vs Billings - Mixed 40s 3.0 Wed.Won 10
W#3 DoublesTravis Beeson / Blythe Murphy vs Steve Billings / Michelle Swinyer6-2, 6-0
2024-05-22vs Nall/ARSC - Mixed 40s 3.0 WedWon 10
W#1 DoublesBlythe Murphy / Patrick Cummings vs Nermin Hairlahovic / Radha Singh1-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Mixed Dbls Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Deirdre Hjelt
published 3.5
3.36
Blythe Murphy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Chris Sigley
published 3.5
3.34
Tiana Pitts
published
3.33
Christina Mohorn
published 3.5
3.29
Jen Berlin
published
Charles Freeman
published 3.5
3.14
Travis Beeson
published
3.14
Patrick Cummings
published
3.08
Sonia Haslam
published
3.02
Adrian Wezgowiec
published 3
3.00
Katie Bir
published
2.77
Brian Henderson
published 3
2.75
Darrell Stultz
published 3
2.74
Cindy Wood
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Blythe Murphy + Travis Beeson123 matchesnot enough data
Sonia Haslam + Darrell Stultz213 matchesnot enough data
Chris Sigley + Jen Berlin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deirdre Hjelt
54W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Blythe Murphy
127W–108L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Chris Sigley
56W–25L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.34
Tiana Pitts
38W–24L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Christina Mohorn
35W–41L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.33
Jen Berlin
22W–25L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Charles Freeman
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Travis Beeson
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14
Patrick Cummings
17W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%15%85%
3.14
Sonia Haslam
15W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Adrian Wezgowiec
15W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.02
Katie Bir
27W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Brian Henderson
24W–35L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Darrell Stultz
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
2.75
3
Cindy Wood
10W–12L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.