Teams

Purple

2026 3.0 · 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-02vs PinkLost 02
L#2 DoublesSara Stewart / Amy van Tassell vs Dione Russell / Darla Beutler1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesConnie Spilker / Kandace Wittwer vs Becky Nelson / Danica Oviatt6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-05-26vs PinkSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAmy van Tassell / Sara Stewart vs Lisa Bledsoe / Dione Russell1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKandace Wittwer / Camille Jennings vs Kim Speakman / Danica Oviatt6-4, 6-3
2026-05-19vs PinkSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHilary Koch / Jessica Grant vs Jill Russell / Jutien Page3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCamille Jennings / Suzanne Jensen vs Danica Oviatt / Kim Speakman7-5, 6-4
2026-05-12vs PinkLost 03
L#1 DoublesHilary Koch / Jessica Grant vs Nancy Drabicki / Jill Russell3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSara Stewart / Amy van Tassell vs Dione Russell / Janelle Horton3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCamille Jennings / Connie Spilker vs Janet Lightheart / Cara Garner1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-05-05vs PinkLost 02
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Schramm / Sara Stewart vs Darla Beutler / Lisa Bledsoe4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKandace Wittwer / Suzanne Jensen vs Janet Lightheart / Cara Garner1-6, 3-6
2026-04-28vs PinkLost 12
L#1 DoublesHilary Koch / Jessica Grant vs Nancy Drabicki / Jutien Page3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLori Tharp / Carolyn Schramm vs Janelle Horton / Lisa Bledsoe6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Jensen / Camille Jennings vs Janet Lightheart / Becky Nelson6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pink6014415147
2Purple0641429178

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Maricel Renigen
published 4
3.55
Mary Mathews
published
3.51
Lori Tharp
published
3.28
Camille Jennings
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.22
Suzanne Jensen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Hilary Koch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Kandace Wittwer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Sara Stewart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Carolyn Schramm
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Connie Spilker
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Camille Jennings + Suzanne Jensen6163% games+3.1% vs expected
Maricel Renigen + Mary Mathews5257% games+1.6% vs expected
Connie Spilker + Kandace Wittwer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Maricel Renigen
51W–21L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Mary Mathews
43W–61L career · no lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.55
Lori Tharp
5W–4L career · no lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.51
3
Camille Jennings
11W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.28
Suzanne Jensen
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Hilary Koch
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15
Kandace Wittwer
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Sara Stewart
7W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.01
Carolyn Schramm
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.90
3
Connie Spilker
3W–15L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.