Teams

Firecrackers

2023 40 & OVER WEEKDAY WOMEN · 4.0 W Thursday

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-02-16vs JCC NinasWon 10
W#3 DoublesVictoria van Zile / Jolene Moore vs Veronica Flores / Susan Danielson6-3, 6-1
2023-02-10vs Alamo Heights Jack AcesWon 10
W#3 DoublesTammy Foster / Victoria van Zile vs Bonnie Chumbley / Allison Hayne6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-02-09vs YMCA/HittWon 10
W#2 DoublesTammy Foster / Victoria van Zile vs Delia Barragan / Margaret Neiheisel6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2023-01-19vs Body ShotsWon 10
W#3 DoublesBecki Wortham / Victoria van Zile vs Elaine Covert / Jodee Kolanowski4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Denise Horan
published 4
3.89
Trisha Walker
published
3.83
Becki Wortham
published 4
3.81
Silvia Suputra
published
3.77
Cheryl Adams
published 4
Victoria van Zile
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Fernanda Aguilar
published 4
3.69
Angela Penrod
published 4
3.23
Susie Keylon
published
3.21
Lynn Platteborze
published
Jolene Moore
published
Tammy Foster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Penrod + Fernanda Aguilar2945% games−3.8% vs expected
Susie Keylon + Lynn Platteborze2635% games−5.1% vs expected
Lynn Platteborze + Silvia Suputra213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Denise Horan
16W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
4.00
Trisha Walker
57W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Becki Wortham
23W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
Silvia Suputra
14W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Cheryl Adams
33W–34L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Victoria van Zile
75W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Fernanda Aguilar
8W–14L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Angela Penrod
6W–15L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Susie Keylon
16W–22L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Lynn Platteborze
19W–58L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
Jolene Moore
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tammy Foster
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.