Teams

BMooney

2022 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.69 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-10-12Won 20
W#1 DoublesHoward Critcher / Graham Schillmoller vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPreston Waldo / Lawrence Brock vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-12vs Markham 7.5 ComboSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHoward Critcher / Blake Paro vs Paul Holscher / Joe Neylan0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJonathan Jenkins / Preston Waldo vs Penn Holderness / Willi Hayes6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2022-09-28vs DSwannLost 02
L#2 DoublesJonathan Jenkins / Preston Waldo vs Tony Richardson / David Swann6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBen Barwick / William Mooney vs Greg Kasse / Vincent Conzola3-6, 1-6
2022-09-21vs SLav 7.5 40+Won 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Hill / Blake Paro vs Jason Liner / Philip Gugliotta7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHoward Critcher / Graham Schillmoller vs Chun Lav / Christopher Bricker6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPreston Waldo / Andrew Tate vs Mark Uttridge / John Myers6-3, 6-4
2022-09-14vs IJJones ComboWon 30
W#1 DoublesWilliam Mooney / Andrew Tate vs Philippe Adams / Sean Ahr6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRodney Lohman / John Peterson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPreston Waldo / Lawrence Brock vs Aaron Vedder / John Wagner3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-09-14vs IJJones ComboLost 12
L#1 DoublesPreston Waldo / Andrew Tate vs Wes Snead / Frank Moser2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHoward Critcher / Graham Schillmoller vs Sean Ahr / Patrick Wood6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesWilliam Mooney / Jason Tuttle vs Justin Jones / John van Campen1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-09-07vs Markham 7.5 ComboWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndrew Tate / Preston Waldo vs Paul Holscher / Bryan Barker7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLawrence Brock / William Mooney vs John Markham / Willi Hayes6-3, 6-4
2022-08-31vs JGouveia 7.5 40+Won 21
W#1 DoublesPreston Waldo / Graham Schillmoller vs Larry Essary / Ben Micham7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAndrew Tate / William Mooney vs David McNeill / Chris Henrion3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRodney Lohman / John Peterson vs Jeff Waychoff / David Boyce6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-08-24vs DSwannWon 30
W#1 DoublesLawrence Brock / David Hill vs Kevin Breemes / Ken Nowell6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAndrew Tate / Sean Krause vs Ajaz Sadiq / James Worley7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRodney Lohman / Blake Paro vs Vincent Conzola / Tony Richardson6-3, 6-3
2022-08-17vs SLav 7.5 40+Won 20
W#1 DoublesLawrence Brock / Preston Waldo vs Emanuele Michi / Scott Arra6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAndrew Tate / William Mooney vs Jeff Abercrombie / Jeffrey Monaghen3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Lawrence Brock
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.90
Graham Schillmoller
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.81
Andrew Tate
published 4
3.78
Preston Waldo
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.52
Blake Paro
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Sean Krause
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
William Mooney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Howard Critcher
published 3.5
2.91
Rodney Lohman
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Joe Robinson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lawrence Brock + Graham Schillmoller472159% games+2.3% vs expected
Andrew Tate + Preston Waldo6256% games+1.1% vs expected
Sean Krause + William Mooney15656% games−1.7% vs expected
Rodney Lohman + William Mooney5357% gamesnot enough data
Lawrence Brock + William Mooney8064% gamesnot enough data
Sean Krause + Rodney Lohman5249% gamesnot enough data
Lawrence Brock + Preston Waldo6164% gamesnot enough data
William Mooney + Preston Waldo5262% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lawrence Brock
326W–122L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Graham Schillmoller
170W–74L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Andrew Tate
17W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Preston Waldo
145W–52L career · 9 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
3.5
Blake Paro
53W–42L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
3.52
Sean Krause
58W–51L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
William Mooney
125W–72L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Howard Critcher
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3
Rodney Lohman
81W–100L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91
Joe Robinson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.