Teams

Sports Mall-Team Fun

2025 Fall Indoor League-Saturday · 2.5W

12 players · average NTRP 2.72 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-13vs SL Tennis-TurnbowLost 12
W#1 DoublesMadison Milligan / Amanda Robinson vs Pat Thomas / Emily Lammers7-5, 1-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesArtiska Dorsey / Corina Nabaum vs Elise Buchman / Carissa Monroy1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnna Eschler / Diana Xiaowen Yang vs Brooke Louis / Dart Schmalz0-6, 2-6
2025-12-06vs Liberty Park-En FuegoWon 20
W#1 DoublesAishan Zhong / Jenna DeLong vs Heather Gough / Jennie Moser6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnna Eschler / Tejaswini Vaidya vs Mindy Wilson / Marley Dominguez6-3, 5-3
2025-11-22vs Level UpLost 12
W#1 DoublesHailey Jensen / Amanda Robinson vs Kassidy Oasay / Jennifer Lopez Monsalve6-1, 5-3
L#2 DoublesMadison Milligan / Corina Nabaum vs Mikelle Pouwer / Sanjana Ramesh3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAishan Zhong / Diana Xiaowen Yang vs Megan Walters / Bri Hernandez3-6, 4-3, 0-1
2025-11-15vs Liberty Park-For the LoveSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKaren Weyman / Madison Milligan vs Jenna Pike / Heather Wissler6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHailey Jensen / Diana Xiaowen Yang vs Adri Soffe / Stacy Harbertson2-6, 2-6
2025-11-08vs Cottonwood Club - Special KWon 21
W#1 DoublesTejaswini Vaidya / Aishan Zhong vs Kristin Rocke / Carrie Peterson6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesArtiska Dorsey / Olivia Moreton vs Kristine Johnson / Lisa Harrison6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Eschler / Corina Nabaum vs Kylee Bryson / Lindsay Sparks5-7, 2-3
2025-11-01vs SL Tennis-TurnbowWon 10
W#1 DoublesJenna DeLong / Amanda Robinson vs Carissa Monroy / Brooke Louis6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.39 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Jenna DeLong
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
Artiska Dorsey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Aishan Zhong
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.48
Tejaswini Vaidya
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.42
Madison Milligan
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.40
Karen Weyman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Hailey Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Anna Eschler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Diana Xiaowen Yang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.21
Corina Nabaum
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.21
Amanda Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.90
Olivia Moreton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Madison Milligan + Hailey Jensen9360% games+14.9% vs expected
Madison Milligan + Karen Weyman6070% games+5.3% vs expected
Olivia Moreton + Karen Weyman3845% games−3.4% vs expected
Madison Milligan + Amanda Robinson224 matchesnot enough data
Hailey Jensen + Karen Weyman404 matchesnot enough data
Tejaswini Vaidya + Jenna DeLong134 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Robinson + Jenna DeLong224 matchesnot enough data
Olivia Moreton + Hailey Jensen033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jenna DeLong
65W–45L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Artiska Dorsey
23W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Aishan Zhong
15W–24L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
2.66
3
Tejaswini Vaidya
34W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
2.5
Madison Milligan
60W–74L career · 10 lines in 2025
0%71%29%
2.42
Karen Weyman
30W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
0%76%24%
2.40
Hailey Jensen
36W–38L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%83%17%
2.37
2.5
Anna Eschler
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Diana Xiaowen Yang
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Corina Nabaum
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
2.5
Amanda Robinson
24W–46L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Olivia Moreton
84W–118L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.