Teams

Pa.Cochran55A

2024 Capital Adult 55 & Over · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.07 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-04-22vs Ca.Conzola55ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesLisa Lathram / Ranita Airington vs Sue Norcia / Sara Wilhelmy6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMary Ann Enzweiler / Eleanor Jones vs Hope Graney / Julie Liddle3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-15vs Sy.Daigle55AWon 21
W#1 DoublesPaula Cochran / Lisa Lathram vs Tracey Carlin / Joyce Lake3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim Hopkins / Christine Mccorquodale vs Leslie Corn / Sylvie Daigle3-6, 0-3
W#3 DoublesDiane Burnette / Mary Strothmann vs Jane Stutzman / Kimberlei Gill7-5, 7-6
2024-04-08vs An.Ashburn55AWon 21
W#1 DoublesRanita Airington / Lisa Lathram vs Alison Bernhardt / Wendy Burkard6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDiane Burnette / Mary Strothmann vs Deanna Drescher / Karen Gupton2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarol Vervaert / Mary Ann Enzweiler vs Jane Doe / Cynthia White6-3, 6-4
2024-04-01vs El.Osbourne55ALost 02
L#1 DoublesRegina Davis / Lisa Lathram vs Cassie Fuller / Joan Faulkner2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPaula Cochran / Bernadette David-Yerumo vs Jocelyn Badulis / Ellen Osbourne1-6, 1-6
2024-03-25vs Di.Sauer55ALost 03
L#1 DoublesRanita Airington / Mary Ann Enzweiler vs Kathleen Fyda-Turner / Diane Sauer0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEleanor Jones / Mary Strothmann vs Karen Murphy / Kathleen Lis2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Vervaert / Kim Hopkins vs Gwen Hedgepeth / Christine Rowe2-6, 2-6
2024-03-18vs Di.Williams55A3.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesRanita Airington / Paula Cochran vs Jennifer McCown / Jorgelina Stroud6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarol Vervaert / Christine Mccorquodale vs Diane Williams / Theresa Rosario-Jansen3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Lathram / Bernadette David-Yerumo vs Stephanie Lee / Martha Herlihy6-3, 6-4
2024-03-11vs Su.Knowles55ALost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Strothmann / Bernadette David-Yerumo vs Joanne Held / Toni Paladino2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRanita Airington / Lisa Lathram vs Ann Willard / Sarah Glover2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDiane Burnette / Mary Ann Enzweiler vs Annette Tavernaro / Christine Panzl2-6, 3-6
2024-03-04vs Ad.Whitten55ALost 02
L#1 DoublesRanita Airington / Lisa Lathram vs Elaine Capriglione / Jane Hunter2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesPaula Cochran / Eleanor Jones vs Kathy Bostrom / Noelle Schofield1-6, 1-6
2024-02-26vs Di.Abourisk55ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesRanita Airington / Lisa Lathram vs Debi Collins / Alice Snell6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDiane Burnette / Mary Ann Enzweiler vs Alacia Billow / Joy Cooper7-6, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Regina Davis
published
3.10
Lisa Lathram
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
2.98
Mary Strothmann
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
Kim Hopkins
published
2.79
Diane Burnette
published 3
2.75
Carol Vervaert
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.70
Mary Ann Enzweiler
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.65
Christine Mccorquodale
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Paula Cochran
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Eleanor Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Cochran + Mary Ann Enzweiler62639% games−5.5% vs expected
Paula Cochran + Christine Mccorquodale11533% games−7.3% vs expected
Lisa Lathram + Mary Ann Enzweiler6646% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Lathram + Carol Vervaert4352% gamesnot enough data
Paula Cochran + Lisa Lathram1526% gamesnot enough data
Christine Mccorquodale + Carol Vervaert0538% gamesnot enough data
Mary Ann Enzweiler + Carol Vervaert1439% gamesnot enough data
Christine Mccorquodale + Mary Ann Enzweiler044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Regina Davis
27W–45L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Lisa Lathram
42W–89L career · type A · 8 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
Mary Strothmann
111W–114L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
Kim Hopkins
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Diane Burnette
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Carol Vervaert
79W–126L career · 7 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Mary Ann Enzweiler
36W–90L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.70
3
Christine Mccorquodale
37W–166L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
2.65
3
Paula Cochran
28W–117L career · 4 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
2.54
Eleanor Jones
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.