Teams

LWR Boylston

2022 Sarasota Combo 50 & Over Fall Weekday · 8.5 W Thursday

9 players · average NTRP 4.20 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-11-17vs Cedars TysonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSheila Perry / Kim Eck vs Pat Brugger / Lisa Tyson7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBarbara Cogen / Diana Stadelnikas vs Cherie Lopez / Wendy Hillock6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2022-11-16vs Sarasota/WilsonSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKim Eck / Diana Stadelnikas vs Mary Wilson / Carla Rodman6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLauren Ash / Sandy Severs vs Tatyana Ayaroglu / Kara Beene6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2022-11-06vs Sarasota/WilsonLost 01
L#2 DoublesLori Faunce / Barbara Cogen vs Jennifer Bright / Nancy Finman5-7, 1-6
2022-11-03vs Plantation HortonWon 10
W#2 DoublesLauren Ash / Sandy Severs vs Lynn Deuitch / Patricia Dipierro6-1, 6-4
2022-10-30vs Plantation HortonWon 20
W#2 DoublesLori Faunce / Barbara Cogen vs Lynn Deuitch / Connie Weiss2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKim Eck / Diana Stadelnikas vs Marjorie Petruccelli / Susie Lentile6-4, 6-2
2022-10-20vs Sarasota/WilsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKim Eck / Sheila Perry vs Mary Wilson / Carla Rodman3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLauren Ash / Sandy Severs vs Sally Alford / Kristine Szarkowitz6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-10-12vs Cedars TysonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSandy Severs / Gina Damaia vs Cindy Fancher / Wendy Hillock6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLori Faunce / Sheila Perry vs Pat Brugger / Lisa Tyson5-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Christie Boylston
published 4.5
4.03
Kim Eck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Elizabeth Green
published 4.5
3.71
Sheila Perry
published
3.71
Karen Nicholson
published
3.71
Diana Stadelnikas
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.61
Barbara Cogen
published 4
Lori Faunce
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sandy Severs
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Stadelnikas + Sandy Severs3447% games−2.7% vs expected
Diana Stadelnikas + Kim Eck3352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christie Boylston
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
4
Kim Eck
56W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
4.03
4.5
Elizabeth Green
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
3.79
Sheila Perry
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Karen Nicholson
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Diana Stadelnikas
106W–106L career · 7 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Barbara Cogen
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
Lori Faunce
41W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandy Severs
83W–56L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.