Teams

Over Served

2026 18&over Women Day Fall · 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-01-08vs No Drama MamasLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnita Singh / Christine Hogan vs Brianne Tuthill / Christiane Mahoney2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-12-11vs Centercourt ChathamLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnita Singh / Sharon Kahn vs Jamie Kruger / Paula Cheng4-6, 5-7
2025-12-04vs Belles of the BallLost 01
L#3 DoublesDaryl Caiola / Anita Singh vs Leslie Readlinger / Alison Barber3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-11-20vs WestfieldWon 10
W#3 DoublesJeanne White / Anita Singh vs Candice Dalin / Alexis Altberg6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2025-10-23vs Murray HillWon 10
W#3 DoublesJill Markovits / Sharon Kahn vs Nora Heitmann / Jill Munson6-1, 6-4
2025-10-16vs Warren (Marcus)Won 31
L#1 DoublesAnne Marie Ramirez / Cindy Carracino vs Elizabeth McCulloch / Alison Wessels7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesOzge Topcuoglu vs Deborah Marcus6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDaryl Caiola / Jeanne White vs Esther Wendling / Anissa Leh6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSharon Kahn / Anita Singh vs Denise Moser / Lynne Ainge7-5, 6-2
2025-09-25vs West OrangeWon 10
W#3 DoublesSharon Kahn / Anita Singh vs Karen Palm / Mindy Fetner4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-18vs ChesterLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnita Singh / Jeanne White vs Rachel Reed / Pamela Rogers5-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Ozge Topcuoglu
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.42
Staci Acquasanta
published
3.41
Marisa Sobol
published
3.39
Cindy Carracino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Daryl Caiola
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Jill Markovits
published
Anne Marie Ramirez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Christina Maurillo
published 3.5
Christine Hogan
published 3.5
Dara Eisenman
published 3.5
3.15
Anita Singh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Sharon Kahn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jeanne White
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
June Zimmerman
published
Mandy Borys
published
Michelle Brindle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ozge Topcuoglu + Marisa Sobol4255% games+13.7% vs expected
Staci Acquasanta + Marisa Sobol22760% games+8.8% vs expected
Anita Singh + Sharon Kahn10361% games+8.5% vs expected
Anne Marie Ramirez + Jill Markovits3351% games+5.4% vs expected
Anne Marie Ramirez + Cindy Carracino11853% games+2.0% vs expected
Christina Maurillo + Daryl Caiola15657% games+0.5% vs expected
June Zimmerman + Christina Maurillo4448% games+0.3% vs expected
Cindy Carracino + Jill Markovits5358% games+0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ozge Topcuoglu
46W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.63
Staci Acquasanta
34W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Marisa Sobol
30W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Cindy Carracino
100W–59L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Daryl Caiola
62W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
Jill Markovits
93W–50L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Anne Marie Ramirez
64W–52L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Christina Maurillo
65W–47L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Christine Hogan
34W–28L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Dara Eisenman
36W–20L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Anita Singh
56W–34L career · 7 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
Sharon Kahn
48W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.04
Jeanne White
43W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
June Zimmerman
14W–24L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mandy Borys
12W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Brindle
14W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.