Teams

KY/OWB/GREENE

2022 USTA LEAGUE ADULT 40 & OVER OWENSBORO · 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Julia Ray
published
3.87
Diana Hunter
published 4
3.64
Brenda Clayton
published 4
3.62
Kerry Bodenheimer
published
3.19
Anna Greene
published 3.5
Janie Walther
published
Robin Royster
published
Sandra Barnes
published
Stephanie Gray
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Royster + Anna Greene6650% games+0.2% vs expected
Kerry Bodenheimer + Brenda Clayton5551% games−0.5% vs expected
Robin Royster + Julia Ray6352% games−4.5% vs expected
Stephanie Gray + Kerry Bodenheimer1536% gamesnot enough data
Janie Walther + Anna Greene044 matchesnot enough data
Diana Hunter + Kerry Bodenheimer134 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Gray + Brenda Clayton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julia Ray
68W–35L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Christine Clements
48W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Diana Hunter
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Brenda Clayton
25W–18L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
Kerry Bodenheimer
14W–24L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Anna Greene
27W–29L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Janie Walther
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robin Royster
51W–37L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandra Barnes
33W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephanie Gray
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.