Teams

Team Nelson

2022 Coppermine Tri-Level 18 & Over · Coppermine Tri-Level 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women's Day

9 players · average NTRP 3.60 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-12-07vs Team AkcamLost 01
L#1 DoublesDanielle Barry / Cathy Preisendorfer vs Susan Hillis / Jessica Walsh2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-12-04vs Team TetraultLost 01
L#3 DoublesBrigit Bowers / Dianna Sinofsky vs Marlo Newton / Melanie Yaksich2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-11-30vs Team AkcamWon 10
W#1 DoublesDanielle Barry / Cathy Preisendorfer vs Jessica Walsh / Holly Hoenes4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-11-09vs Team AkcamLost 01
L#1 DoublesCathy Preisendorfer / Tina Holmes vs Karen Robertson / Jessica Walsh5-7, 3-6
2022-11-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesDanielle Barry / Cathy Preisendorfer vs Millie Schaefer / Karen Robertson6-2, 6-3
2022-10-24vs Team ScottLost 01
L#3 DoublesDianna Sinofsky / Margaret Grow-Sadler vs Aimee MacEda / Michelle Tyde2-6, 5-7
2022-10-19vs Team BelloneSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKimberly Ford / Cathy Preisendorfer vs Susan Hillis / Karen Robertson7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDianna Sinofsky / Sarah Andrews vs Nicole Conkling / Anastasia Nardangeli2-6, 1-6
2022-10-12vs Team BelloneLost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Rauhofer / Dianna Sinofsky vs Martha Whitty / Heather Burnside3-6, 6-7
2022-10-07vs Team CrawleyWon 10
W#3 DoublesDianna Sinofsky / Brigit Bowers vs Sophia Crawley / Andrea Smolen6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-10-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesCathy Preisendorfer / Danielle Barry vs Holly Hoenes / Nancy Ekelund6-1, 6-0
2022-09-28vs Team BelloneLost 01
L#3 DoublesDianna Sinofsky / Jennifer Rauhofer vs Martha Whitty / Ashling Pollard3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Coppermine Tri-Level 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women's Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Danielle Barry
published 4.5
3.90
Cathy Preisendorfer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Kimberly Ford
published
3.56
Tina Holmes
published
3.44
Brooke Davidson
published 3.5
3.31
Tracy Flaherty
published
3.05
Molly Sullivan
published
2.98
Claire Taylor
published 3
2.77
Dianna Sinofsky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Ford + Brooke Davidson314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Danielle Barry
9W–25L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
3.97
4
Cathy Preisendorfer
147W–136L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.90
Kimberly Ford
55W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%25%75%
3.59
Tina Holmes
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
3.5
Brooke Davidson
16W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
Tracy Flaherty
12W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Molly Sullivan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Claire Taylor
25W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.98
3
Dianna Sinofsky
43W–49L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.