Teams

RH-Tuten/Munroe

2024 · 2025 SATA USTA Adult 18 & Over (Women) - Fall

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 SATA USTA Adult 18 & Over (Women) - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Megan Stern
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Michelle Munroe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Sarah Arkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.01
Kim Beveridge
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.98
Sallie Tuten
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Sara Donnet
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.95
Kandi Canady
published
2.93
Nicole Soldan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Levette Dixon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Cindy James
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Pamela Kelley
published
2.69
Kathryn Ortiz
published
2.65
Chelsea Price
published 3
Kaylee Stern
published
Lauren Dever
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Levette Dixon + Kandi Canady8262% games+11.0% vs expected
Levette Dixon + Michelle Munroe4452% games+3.3% vs expected
Sallie Tuten + Sara Donnet5157% games+2.1% vs expected
Sallie Tuten + Kim Beveridge26863% games+1.5% vs expected
Kandi Canady + Michelle Munroe1439% games−1.4% vs expected
Kandi Canady + Sallie Tuten5357% games−3.1% vs expected
Megan Stern + Michelle Munroe2640% games−10.1% vs expected
Sarah Arkins + Levette Dixon1443% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Stern
44W–45L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
Michelle Munroe
34W–31L career · 6 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.14
Sarah Arkins
25W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
Kim Beveridge
66W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Sallie Tuten
71W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%56%43%
2.98
Sara Donnet
40W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
Kandi Canady
26W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Nicole Soldan
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Levette Dixon
38W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Cindy James
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Pamela Kelley
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Kathryn Ortiz
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Chelsea Price
11W–39L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.65
Kaylee Stern
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Dever
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.