Teams

MLF

2022 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - NOCO

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-12vs FCCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesRick Mohr / Michael Tyler vs Jim Kelly / Jerry Krygier2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKen Field / William Ketcham vs Charles Edmondson / Brian Dunbar2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Rubin / David Boon vs Don Walker / Ben Struzenberg7-6, 4-4
2022-08-05vs HMTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesRick Mohr / Michael Tyler vs Kent Mueller / Brian Heskin3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKen Field / William Ketcham vs Keith Montey / Steven Tucker7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJas Dhaliwal / Ernest Chavez vs Dennis Knopf / Glenn Gibson1-6, 4-6
2022-07-29vs LTA GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesErnest Chavez / Michael Tyler vs Scott Hemphill / Jere Barto0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Ketcham / Ken Field vs Richard Kostecki / Klaus Weickmann4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Boon / Robert Rubin vs Dan McGlothlin / Larry Kilgore3-6, 5-7
2022-07-22vs FCCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Tyler / Ernest Chavez vs Robin Wick / Ben Struzenberg2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesWilliam Ketcham / Ken Field vs Jerry Krygier / Brian Dunbar6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRobert Rubin / David Boon vs Charles Edmondson / John Verwys1-6, 3-6
2022-07-15vs HMTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesErnest Chavez / David Boon vs Brian Heskin / Kent Mueller3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Rubin / Rick Mohr vs Steven Tucker / Dennis Knopf3-6, 3-6
2022-07-08vs LTA GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesRobert Rubin / Rick Mohr vs Ed Kellogg / Jon Messick2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Boon / Jas Dhaliwal vs Klaus Weickmann / Timothy Morneau2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · MEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - NOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TAG3310819151
2MLF2451329197

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Ernest Chavez
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
David Boon
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Jas Dhaliwal
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Ken Field
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rick Mohr
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Walter Steige
published
William Ketcham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ken Field + William Ketcham134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ernest Chavez
14W–20L career · 4 lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
3.10
David Boon
0W–9L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jas Dhaliwal
2W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ken Field
6W–14L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rick Mohr
12W–12L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Walter Steige
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
William Ketcham
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.