Teams

Davis/LF

2021 TUL ADULT 40 & Over WOMEN League · 2.5 WOMEN

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-04-20vs Hosier/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Davis / Amy VanBrunt vs Cynthia Turner / Val Hansen6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesHaven Willis vs Margaret Hosier6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesShannon Juen / Joan Hurt vs Amy Greenhaw / Tami Foust2-6, 4-6
2021-04-07vs Crowley/ISLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngela Garcia / Tresa Johnson vs Debbie Crowley / Kathy Roberts0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKimberley Hendrix vs Barb Evans1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPam Michalczewski / Jennifer Marshall vs Lori Smith / Cindy Vick6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2021-04-05vs TUL: Wyatt/SHSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSarah Davis / Haven Willis vs Kristy Andrew / Jenny Hoecker6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJennifer Marshall / Kimberley Hendrix vs Angel Kymes / Kimberly Lazenby3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-04-01vs Wills/TTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy VanBrunt / Tina Nikel vs Alexis Gonzales / Tori Snyder6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHaven Willis vs Krystal Williams2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShannon Juen / Pam Michalczewski vs Nina Butchko / Jennifer Potts0-6, 0-6
2021-03-25vs Wills/TTCLost 02
L#1 SinglesAngela Garcia vs TJ Warren1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKimberley Hendrix / Joan Hurt vs Gretchen Byford / Krystal Williams1-6, 3-6
2021-03-24vs Crowley/ISLost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberley Hendrix / Jennifer Marshall vs Kay Gulledge / Bassima Roz5-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Davis vs Sheila Cooper6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesShannon Juen / Pam Michalczewski vs Candace Chonka / Kathy Roberts1-6, 0-6
2021-03-09vs Hosier/LFLost 12
L#1 DoublesTina Nikel / Tresa Johnson vs Guylene Dooman / Tami Foust3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesHaven Willis vs Cynthia Turner6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJoan Hurt / Shannon Juen vs Ann Smith / Stephanie Heckenkemper2-6, 2-6
2021-03-01vs TUL: Wyatt/SHLost 02
L#1 DoublesAngela Garcia / Kimberley Hendrix vs Angel Kymes / Heather May4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesSarah Davis vs Brooke Sturdivant2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wills/TTC4415922190
2Crowley/IS44131125195
3Hosier/LF3591534247
4Davis/LF1751938249

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.41 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Haven Willis
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.55
Jennifer Marshall
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.31
Kimberley Hendrix
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.20
Angela Yelich
published 2.5
2.19
Shannon Juen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.18
Angela Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Joan Hurt
published
Pam Michalczewski
published
Sarah Davis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Tina Nikel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Juen + Joan Hurt224 matchesnot enough data
Kimberley Hendrix + Jennifer Marshall134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Haven Willis
206W–111L career · 4 lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.02
Jennifer Marshall
18W–25L career · 3 lines in 2021
0%35%65%
2.55
Kimberley Hendrix
24W–82L career · 5 lines in 2021
93%7%<1%
2.31
2.5
Angela Yelich
34W–43L career · no lines in 2021
0%99%1%
2.20
Shannon Juen
10W–31L career · 4 lines in 2021
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Angela Garcia
44W–109L career · 3 lines in 2021
0%99%1%
2.18
Joan Hurt
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Pam Michalczewski
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sarah Davis
32W–15L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tina Nikel
12W–18L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.