Teams

Lagoon-Long-3.0-55-Spring-Night

2025 Spring USTA 55 & Over Night League-Montgomery · 3.0 Women Night

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-18vs Lagoon-Sellers Spring Night 55Won 21
W#1 DoublesCarla Rush / Holly Sharp vs Karen Agnello / Chrissy Foxworth6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRegina Dinger / Joan Ensley vs Diane Johnson / Kim McDonald2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDiane Branch / Deborah Long vs Jewell Pitts / Gina Sellers6-3, 6-1
2025-03-11vs Lagoon-Sellers Spring Night 55Won 20
W#1 DoublesCarla Rush / Holly Sharp vs Karen Agnello / Chrissy Foxworth6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRegina Dinger / Joan Ensley vs Felicia Brooks / Joy Darley2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-25vs Lagoon-Sellers Spring Night 55Won 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Doyle / Conitha King vs Kim McDonald / Kaye Melnick6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDeborah Long / Holly Sharp vs Karen Mosier / Valerie Smedley5-2
W#3 DoublesCarla Rush / Sharon Woernle vs Joy Darley / Diane Johnson3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-02-18vs Lagoon-Sellers Spring Night 55Won 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Doyle / Diane Branch vs Karen Agnello / Chrissy Foxworth5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarla Rush / Conitha King vs DEBRA SLEDGE / Felicia Brooks6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJoan Ensley / Regina Dinger vs Gina Sellers / Jewell Pitts2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-02-17vs Lagoon-Sellers Spring Night 55Won 30
W#1 DoublesDiane Branch / Elizabeth Doyle vs Karen Agnello / Joy Darley6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDeborah Long / Holly Sharp vs Karen Mosier / Beth Sadler6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRegina Dinger / Sharon Woernle vs Diane Johnson / Kaye Melnick6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-02-04vs Lagoon-Sellers Spring Night 55Won 21
L#1 DoublesDiane Branch / Conitha King vs Joy Darley / Kim McDonald4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Doyle / Joan Ensley vs Karen Mosier / Valerie Smedley6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDeborah Long / Holly Sharp vs Kaye Melnick / Gina Sellers6-1, 6-0
2025-01-28vs Lagoon-Sellers Spring Night 55Won 30
W#1 DoublesDiane Branch / Elizabeth Doyle vs Karen Agnello / DEBRA SLEDGE6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHolly Sharp / Sharon Woernle vs Chrissy Foxworth / Beth Sadler6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRegina Dinger / Carla Rush vs Felicia Brooks / Valerie Smedley6-3, 6-3
2025-01-26vs Lagoon-Sellers Spring Night 55Won 21
W#1 DoublesDiane Branch / Conitha King vs Kim McDonald / DEBRA SLEDGE6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRegina Dinger / Sharon Woernle vs Chrissy Foxworth / Beth Sadler6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Doyle / Deborah Long vs Felicia Brooks / Joy Darley7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lagoon-Long-3.0-55-Spring-Night8020413173
2Lagoon-Sellers Spring Night 550842042266

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Holly Sharp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Diane Branch
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
3.13
Elizabeth Doyle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.90
Conitha King
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.85
Sharon Woernle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.80
Carla Rush
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.80
Regina Dinger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Joan Ensley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Deborah Long
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Ensley + Sharon Woernle3645% games+2.1% vs expected
Elizabeth Doyle + Diane Branch5066% games+1.8% vs expected
Sharon Woernle + Elizabeth Doyle3353% games+1.7% vs expected
Regina Dinger + Sharon Woernle8653% games+1.3% vs expected
Carla Rush + Conitha King9750% games−0.2% vs expected
Joan Ensley + Regina Dinger141846% games−0.6% vs expected
Sharon Woernle + Carla Rush4159% gamesnot enough data
Carla Rush + Holly Sharp4154% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Holly Sharp
84W–40L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
3
Diane Branch
15W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.14
3.5
Elizabeth Doyle
31W–32L career · 6 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.13
3
Conitha King
27W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.90
Sharon Woernle
53W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Carla Rush
40W–58L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.80
Regina Dinger
52W–69L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Joan Ensley
44W–75L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Deborah Long
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.