Teams

Sloan, Jerry

2026 Combo 55 & Over-JXN · Men 6.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-30vs Merchant, TomLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrett Knight / Randy Lominick vs Randy Harris / Louis Saddler3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Germany / Kevin Farrell vs Phillip Pace / Dwayne Chisolm0-6, 2-6
2026-08-23vs Merchant, TomLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrian Germany / Randy Lominick vs Stan Fisher / Kevin Dotson1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesByron Galloway / Jim Davis vs Darryl Barnes / Joseph McCray7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMitch Stentiford / David Dunn vs Randy Harris / Jason Renkenberger6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-08-09vs Merchant, TomLost 03
L#1 DoublesMitch Stentiford / David Dunn vs Greg McNair / Jason Renkenberger2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMitch Wolverton / Jim Davis vs Tommy Taylor / Joseph McCray7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrett Knight / Kevin Farrell vs Stanley Jenkins / Louis Saddler2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Merchant, Tom1030121
2Sloan, Jerry0103638

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Byron Galloway
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Brett Knight
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Mitch Stentiford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Brian Germany
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.78
Jim Davis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Jerry Sloan
published
2.41
Kevin Farrell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Randy Lominick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mitch Wolverton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mitch Stentiford + Byron Galloway213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Byron Galloway
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Brett Knight
14W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
Mitch Stentiford
29W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Brian Germany
19W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
Jim Davis
9W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.78
Jerry Sloan
6W–15L career · no lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
Kevin Farrell
4W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.41
Randy Lominick
10W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.40
Mitch Wolverton
6W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.