Teams

SDNC WD LLW 3.5 Santaluz Club/ Vandling

2025 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SDNC WD · SDNC - Women - 3.5 WD

16 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-21vs SDNC 3.5 RPTC(2:2)/ BristolLost 01
L#3 DoublesKristen Howell / Frederica Yang vs Onay Havens / Vicky Benito5-7, 6-7
2025-03-18vs SDNC 3.5 Miramar(2:2)/ LeeWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarisa Reinoso / Karen Schillinger vs Nichola Diggs / Azumi Ueno6-2, 7-6
2025-03-05vs SDNC 3.5 RBCTC(2:2)/ LiuWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Schillinger / Lisa Scala vs Betsy San Jose / Lidia Rose6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesLisa Scala / Frederica Yang vs Holly Weber / Elizabeth Nunez6-3, 7-6
2025-02-21vs SDNC 3.5 Fairbanks(2:2)/ DolinskyLost 01
L#2 DoublesKristen Howell / Rachel Wagner vs Nichole Dolinsky / Jodie Simbolon3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-24vs SDNC 3.5 Fairbanks(3:1)/ O'RourkeWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Scala / Nancy Cirillo vs Katy Zhi / Leslie Mereminsky6-4, 6-0
2025-01-17vs SDNC 3.5 Lomas(2:2)/ GoodeWon 10
W#3 DoublesBella Pfefferman / Kristen Howell vs Donna Granholm / Catherine Garcia Barry6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-01-10vs SDNC 3.5 La Valle(2:2)/ BrickWon 20
W#2 DoublesKaren Schillinger / Lisa Scala vs Ellen Kerr / Margie Jones6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRachel Wagner / Marisa Reinoso vs Mary Jo Preti / Alexandra Avedisian6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 3.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Kristen Howell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.49
Melissa Mead
published
3.45
Wynn Austin
published
3.31
Frederica Yang
published
3.31
Lisa Scala
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.27
Nancy Cirillo
published
3.25
Margie Zill
published
3.25
Rachel Wagner
published
3.23
Margaret Holland
published
3.19
Karen Leininger
published
3.19
Bella Pfefferman
published 3.5
3.14
Marisa Reinoso
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Marla Vandling
published
3.08
Amy Monteparte
published 3.5
Sandra Uribe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Wagner + Kristen Howell7156% games−1.9% vs expected
Marla Vandling + Karen Leininger3553% games−6.5% vs expected
Margaret Holland + Rachel Wagner5259% gamesnot enough data
Marisa Reinoso + Frederica Yang213 matchesnot enough data
Margaret Holland + Nancy Cirillo123 matchesnot enough data
Amy Monteparte + Bella Pfefferman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anna Maria Zamorano
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Kristen Howell
66W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
Melissa Mead
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Wynn Austin
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
Frederica Yang
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Lisa Scala
43W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Nancy Cirillo
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Margie Zill
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
Rachel Wagner
17W–11L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Margaret Holland
15W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Karen Leininger
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Bella Pfefferman
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Marisa Reinoso
39W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Marla Vandling
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Amy Monteparte
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Sandra Uribe
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.