Teams

Ammerman-CC

2026 CORTA 55 & Over Mixed Doubles Regional Championship · 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-22vs Venkatesu/SequoyahWon 30
W#1 DoublesScott Ammerman / Calina Creech vs Denise Smith / Mark Williams6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Roberts / Shirley Cargill vs Ann Carroll / Parmesh Venkatesu6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSun Kim / Julie Sway vs Cami Marcus / Joey Still6-3, 6-2
2026-03-21vs Shayne-CCWon 21
L#1 DoublesScott Ammerman / Shirley Cargill vs John Hunter / Vicki Carde6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Sway / Richard Galbraith vs Andrea Walden / Jeffery McGarr6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPaul Kettering / Laura Dudley vs Michael Terrell / Gloria Shayne6-0, 7-6
2026-03-20vs Venkatesu/SequoyahWon 30
W#1 DoublesRichard Galbraith / Julie Sway vs Denise Smith / Steven Waters4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesScott Ammerman / Calina Creech vs Mark Williams / Holly Williams6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSun Kim / Leigh Kosobucki vs Cami Marcus / Joey Still4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-03-20vs Shayne-CCWon 21
L#1 DoublesSun Kim / Leigh Kosobucki vs Bruce Roberts / Diana Newman7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCalina Creech / John Roberts vs John Hunter / Andrea Walden6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaura Dudley / Paul Kettering vs Gloria Shayne / Donald Kean6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ammerman-CC40102674
2Shayne-CC135717129
3Venkatesu/Sequoyah133921131

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Scott Ammerman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Julie Sway
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Calina Creech
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Laura Dudley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Paul Kettering
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Shirley Cargill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
Richard Galbraith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Leigh Kosobucki
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Ammerman
67W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
Julie Sway
51W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Calina Creech
71W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Laura Dudley
26W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Paul Kettering
14W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
Shirley Cargill
21W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
Richard Galbraith
32W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Leigh Kosobucki
26W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.