Teams

Goodwin/Murfreesboro

2026 Combo 40 & Over-Wednesday · Hybrid Murfreesboro

6 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Hybrid Murfreesboro
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Goodwin/Murfreesboro000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Stuart Littleton
published
3.54
Brian Shubert
published 4
3.31
Matt McCord
published
Alexander Mitchell
published 3.5
2.73
Ryan Cluff
published
Thomas Goodwyn
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stuart Littleton
13W–12L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Brian Shubert
9W–12L career · no lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.54
Matt McCord
17W–8L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Alexander Mitchell
2W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ryan Cluff
8W–8L career · no lines in 2026
>99%<1%0%
2.73
Thomas Goodwyn
6W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.