Teams

AYTC-Nolan

2021 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-07Won 21
W#1 DoublesDenise Nolan / Mara Ferrari vs Mary Mercier / Kathryn Sherman6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDebbie Montgomery / Shelley Morrison vs Ellen Johnson / Sheilah Clark4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKatharine McKee / Cheryl Pleas vs Jolene Momcilovich / Sara Kuhl6-0, 6-2
2021-06-01Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMara Ferrari / Denise Nolan vs Carmen Almodovar / Patrice Dicasparro3-6, 5-5
W#2 DoublesDebbie Montgomery / Shelley Morrison vs Carolyn Tanksley / Susan Fascitelli6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJudy Teshima / Jill Strohmeier vs Bonnie Paasche / Mami Shimomura5-7, 1-6
2021-05-18vs HBSQ-ReaWon 30
W#1 DoublesDenise Nolan / Mara Ferrari vs Ellen Johnson / Kathryn Sherman6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShelley Morrison / Katharine McKee vs Sue Cooper / Margaret Daniels6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJill Strohmeier / Judy Teshima vs Barbara Kristek / Jolene Momcilovich - *2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-05-06Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDenise Nolan / Shelley Morrison vs Carmen Almodovar / Patrice Dicasparro2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarybeth Alwood / Ana Maria Freund vs Corliss Liekkio / Bonnie Paasche2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Franklin / Judy Ozuna vs Marilou Rolfe / Carolyn Tanksley5-7, 4-3
2021-04-27Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDenise Nolan / Shelley Morrison vs Ellen Johnson / Pamela Elliott2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHeidi Broecking / Karen Felton vs Barbara Kristek / Mary Monroe4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMarybeth Alwood / Ana Maria Freund vs Carol Rea / Brenda Bush6-4, 6-4
2021-04-20Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDenise Nolan / Jill Strohmeier vs Carmen Almodovar / Patrice Dicasparro1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesShelley Morrison / Heidi Broecking vs Bonnie Paasche / Corliss Liekkio6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarybeth Alwood / Francisca Lehr vs Susan Fascitelli / Mami Shimomura2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BC-Dunlop601627118
2AYTC-Nolan2471121169
3HBSQ-Rea1541429194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Mara Ferrari
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Debbie Montgomery
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Denise Nolan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.34
Cheryl Pleas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Jill Strohmeier
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Ana Maria Freund
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.19
Judy Teshima
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Shelley Morrison
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.13
Elizabeth Franklin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Francisca Lehr
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.03
Heidi Broecking
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.03
Karen Felton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.02
Sandy Swift
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Judy Ozuna
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Marybeth Alwood
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy Teshima + Jill Strohmeier11854% games+3.8% vs expected
Debbie Montgomery + Denise Nolan7751% games−1.0% vs expected
Shelley Morrison + Marybeth Alwood6947% gamesnot enough data
Marybeth Alwood + Denise Nolan2548% gamesnot enough data
Shelley Morrison + Denise Nolan0533% gamesnot enough data
Ana Maria Freund + Marybeth Alwood2343% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Franklin + Marybeth Alwood5069% gamesnot enough data
Karen Felton + Sandy Swift134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mara Ferrari
312W–180L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%82%17%
3.88
4
Debbie Montgomery
154W–103L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Denise Nolan
72W–88L career · 6 lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
3.55
3.5
Cheryl Pleas
11W–35L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.34
3.5
Jill Strohmeier
25W–16L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Ana Maria Freund
16W–21L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Judy Teshima
34W–37L career · 2 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Shelley Morrison
43W–51L career · 9 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Elizabeth Franklin
46W–35L career · 1 line in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Francisca Lehr
88W–100L career · 6 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Heidi Broecking
26W–28L career · 5 lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Karen Felton
29W–49L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%41%59%
3.03
3.5
Sandy Swift
45W–50L career · 4 lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
3.02
3
Judy Ozuna
14W–30L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
3
Marybeth Alwood
39W–76L career · 6 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.