Teams

Plantation Wise Aces

2025 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Spring Weekday · 4.0 W Tuesday

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-06-10vs River Strand Jumping BeenesWon 10
W#1 DoublesAna Areosa / Connie Weiss vs Annmarie Curle / Penny Franklin6-2, 6-3
2025-06-03vs Cedars Tyson & SeiderWon 10
W#1 DoublesConnie Weiss / Ana Areosa vs Yuka Pearl / Vickie Miller6-3, 6-2
2025-05-27vs Lakewood NationalLost 02
L#1 DoublesConnie Weiss / Ana Areosa vs Deana Antonelli-Pike / Mary Gill7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesValerie Lansdale / Rachel Rocks vs Wanda Gilbert / Meredith Poppler5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2025-05-20vs SSC DavyWon 10
W#3 DoublesRachel Rocks / Valerie Lansdale vs Michelle McGrath / Nikki Gifford6-0, 6-3
2025-05-13vs LWR Sweet SpotsWon 10
W#3 DoublesValerie Lansdale / Janet Kramer vs Karen Patchell / Celia Pena4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-06vs LWR RainSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRachel Rocks / Theresa Watson vs Bernadette Waterman / Angela Heck6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDiane Crews / Valerie Lansdale vs Victoria Sanchez / Wendy Zevin7-6, 7-6
2025-04-29vs Laurel Oak Spring FlingsLost 01
L#2 DoublesDiane Crews / Valerie Lansdale vs Joyce Weiss / Cindi Gomez6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-04-22vs Sarasota/Caldwell/40&Over4.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesAna Areosa / Connie Weiss vs Linda Steen / Beth Robinson5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-15vs LWR McAloonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJanet Kramer / Ana Areosa vs Gina Hagopian / Sheila Perry7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2025-04-08vs Mooney MissionLost 02
L#1 SinglesClaudia Schmidt vs Angela Striffler-Pierre0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRachel Rocks / Theresa Watson vs Halle Ghose / Julie Jordan6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-25vs LBK Public Serve-ivorsWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanet Kramer / Ana Areosa vs Sue Campbell / Kelly Ochsenreiter1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesClaudia Schmidt vs Annette Shores5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatricia Dipierro / Maureen Rasp-Glose vs Amy Heeter / Sandra Duryea6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Tuesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Ana Areosa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Sheila Engert
published
3.79
Diane Crews
published 4
3.75
Rachel Rocks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Claudia Schmidt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.69
Connie Weiss
published 4
3.56
Michelle Bergeron
published
3.55
Theresa Watson
published
3.53
Valerie Lansdale
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.47
Lesli Andrews
published
Ellen Lori Smith MD
published
Janet Kramer
published
Maureen Rasp-Glose
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mitzi Lamy
published
Nancy Horne
published
Nora Saxe
published
Robyn Scalzo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Rocks + Theresa Watson2351% games+8.7% vs expected
Ana Areosa + Janet Kramer314 matchesnot enough data
Ana Areosa + Connie Weiss224 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Rocks + Valerie Lansdale134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ana Areosa
139W–118L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
Sheila Engert
19W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Diane Crews
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Rachel Rocks
40W–74L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Claudia Schmidt
34W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Connie Weiss
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Michelle Bergeron
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
Theresa Watson
4W–14L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Valerie Lansdale
46W–49L career · 5 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
Lesli Andrews
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Ellen Lori Smith MD
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Janet Kramer
20W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Maureen Rasp-Glose
41W–52L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mitzi Lamy
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Horne
32W–25L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nora Saxe
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robyn Scalzo
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.