Teams

7 ACAC Chandler

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-07vs 11 Kanawha BarrangerLost 12
L#1 SinglesStephen Chandler vs STEVEN ROBERTS4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJohn Kosco vs Sam Cohen2-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesKen Lowenstein vs Patrick Barranger6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-15vs 1 MTC JacobsenLost 02
L#1 SinglesAlexander Smith vs Christopher Geoghegan1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesKen Lowenstein vs Niell Jacobsen2-6, 0-6
2025-10-10vs 2 MTC WinnerWon 21
W#1 SinglesAlexander Smith vs Blake Winner6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJohn Kosco vs Greg Dean0-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesKen Hatcher vs Michael May6-1, 6-1
2025-10-06vs 4 Lakeside Kings 3.5Won 20
W#2 SinglesIrvin Banks vs Ian Horwitz7-5, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJohn Kosco vs Brian Cox7-5, 6-3
2025-09-22vs 5 ACAC DennisLost 02
L#1 SinglesIrvin Banks vs Anthony Forgey4-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesAlexander Smith vs Kurt Shores6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-15vs 12 Burkwood Jones 3.5Lost 12
W#1 SinglesIrvin Banks vs Abel Guzman6-4, 7-6
L#2 SinglesStephen Chandler vs Kevin Carter2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 SinglesKen Hatcher vs Christian Ramos2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Irvin Banks
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.43
Marc Elim
published
3.33
3.32
John Kosco
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.32
Ken Hatcher
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.26
Stephen Chandler
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.18
Joseph Cipolla
published
3.11
Alexander Smith
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Ken Lowenstein
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Irvin Banks
27W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Marc Elim
16W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Venkatachelam Regulagedda
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
John Kosco
12W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Ken Hatcher
15W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
Stephen Chandler
24W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Joseph Cipolla
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Alexander Smith
18W–37L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Ken Lowenstein
18W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.