Teams

Quinlan - String Theory 3.5

2025 Howard Singles · Howard Singles 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.40 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-11-02vs Phan - All the Singles Ladies 3.5Split 11
W#1 SinglesColleen Knapp vs Erin McVeigh4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 SinglesLena Brandenburg vs Kim Atkinson3-6, 5-7
2025-10-21vs mccullough - Single Bounce 3.5Won 10
W#3 SinglesLena Brandenburg vs Jennifer Nazaire3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-14vs Thongphok - Rose All Play 3.5Won 10
W#1 SinglesLesli Thompson vs Alison Serino6-3, 6-4
2025-10-10vs Phan - All the Singles Ladies 3.5Lost 02
L#2 SinglesColleen Knapp vs Erin McVeigh1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesLesli Thompson vs Bari Abensohn6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-10-08vs Chung - Rally Cats 3.5Split 11
L#1 SinglesLesli Thompson vs Jennifer Coady1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesLena Brandenburg vs Paola Osaki3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-09-29vs mccullough - Single Bounce 3.5Lost 12
W#1 SinglesLesli Thompson vs Natalie Leveque6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesColleen Knapp vs Elvira McCullough4-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesLena Brandenburg vs Karlene Brathwaite3-6, 3-6
2025-09-19Lost 01
L#2 SinglesColleen Quinlan vs Kathryn Williams1-6, 1-6
2025-09-14vs Chung - Rally Cats 3.5Lost 02
L#1 SinglesColleen Knapp vs Teresa Russin3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesLesli Thompson vs Paola Osaki6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-11vs mccullough - Single Bounce 3.5Split 11
L#1 SinglesColleen Knapp vs Elvira McCullough1-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesLena Brandenburg vs Mary Klyap6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Amy Luo
published 3.5
3.45
Lesli Thompson
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.21
Colleen Knapp
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.16
Colleen Quinlan
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Lena Brandenburg
usually #3 Singles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
3.08
Pam Franks
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Luo
28W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.74
3.5
Lesli Thompson
155W–121L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Colleen Knapp
66W–77L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Colleen Quinlan
118W–96L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
3
Lena Brandenburg
92W–73L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Pam Franks
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.