Teams

1-DNagelhout-HS

2023 Eno River Mixed 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult Mixed 6.0 Evening

12 players · average NTRP 2.94 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-24vs 2-MMacdonald-HS-55/6.0MixedLost 01
L#2 DoublesCamille Blommer / Thomas Rexrode vs Jennifer Hoffmann / Michael Holt3-6, 3-6
2023-07-17vs 2-MMacdonald-HS-55/6.0MixedLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Nagelhout / Linda Nagelhout vs Van Blalock / Jennifer Hoffmann0-6, 2-6
2023-07-03vs 2-MMacdonald-HS-55/6.0MixedLost 01
L#3 DoublesLinda Naden / David Nagelhout vs Millicent Snow / Jeff Denhard2-6, 0-6
2023-06-28vs 2-MMacdonald-HS-55/6.0MixedSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDavid Nagelhout / Kristen Bradfield vs Van Blalock / Dori Liller0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHayes Hofler / Linda Nagelhout vs Jeff Denhard / Millicent Snow4-6, 2-6
2023-06-12vs 2-MMacdonald-HS-55/6.0MixedLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Nagelhout / Leslie Jackson vs Scott Hartman / Mary Macdonald4-6, 1-6
2023-06-05vs 2-MMacdonald-HS-55/6.0MixedLost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Nagelhout / Hayes Hofler vs Michael Holt / Dori Liller4-6, 1-6
2023-05-22vs 2-MMacdonald-HS-55/6.0MixedSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDave Thomas / Kathy Holt vs Chris Konvalinka / Terrie Blalock3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPhil Nobile / Linda Nagelhout vs Scott Hartman / Jennifer Hoffmann0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult Mixed 6.0 Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Dave Thomas
published 3
2.83
Russell Davis
published
2.82
2.80
Camille Blommer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Hayes Hofler
published 3
2.66
Linda Nagelhout
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.62
David Nagelhout
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.56
Kristen Bradfield
published
2.49
Kathy Holt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.25
Linda Naden
published
2.17
David Naden
published 2.5
Thomas Rexrode
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dave Thomas + Linda Nagelhout314 matchesnot enough data
Linda Nagelhout + David Nagelhout134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dave Thomas
34W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
2.95
Russell Davis
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Darrell Bradfield
7W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Camille Blommer
73W–74L career · 1 line in 2023
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Hayes Hofler
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Linda Nagelhout
45W–68L career · 4 lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
David Nagelhout
44W–55L career · 4 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
2.62
Kristen Bradfield
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Kathy Holt
25W–63L career · type A · 1 line in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.49
Linda Naden
4W–19L career · no lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
2.25
2.5
David Naden
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.17
Thomas Rexrode
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.