Teams

KCox (MPCC)

2025 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-03vs MHussey (Carmel)Won 20
W#1 DoublesRebecca Drendel / Kathryn Ford vs Stacy Doline / Maureen Hussey6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPatti Glassner / Sandra Schulte vs Abbie Dougherty / Mary Davis6-2, 7-5
2025-09-26vs KGreathouse (Russell)Won 20
W#2 DoublesPatti Glassner / Sandra Schulte vs Heather Gwaltney / Christie Hansen6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Drendel / Leslie Simmons vs Shawna Knutson / Bernice Cutler4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-19vs TBlankenship (PCC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesTorey Parsons / Sarah Ryan vs Reena Chow / Cassandra Greco6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKatie Cox / Rebecca Drendel vs Lee Sugg / Joan Bullard6-1, 6-2
2025-09-05vs KOShea/RFitzsimons (Carmel)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTorey Parsons / Kathryn Ford vs Amy Yancey / Kylie Holt2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRebecca Drendel / Patti Glassner vs Deb Childress / Shelby Stahl2-6, 2-6
2025-08-29vs ERust (Foxcroft Hills)Won 20
W#2 DoublesLeslie Simmons / Sandra Schulte vs Janet Rogers / Kakie Cheek6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKatie Cox / Rebecca Drendel vs Gina Arado / Elizabeth McIntyre3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-08-22vs KMassaro (WSRC)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesTorey Parsons / Patti Glassner vs Cameron Logar / Elizabeth Campbell2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKathryn Ford / Sandra Schulte vs Tracy Lacroix / Kim Pizii7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-08-11vs GBolanos (Brookhaven)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKathryn Ford / Torey Parsons vs Brenda Tobia / Laura Hunter6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Catherine Hensley
published 3.5
3.11
Rebecca Drendel
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.02
Haley Timperio
published
3.02
Katie Cox
published
3.02
Sandra Schulte
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.93
Torey Parsons
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
Jennifer Farrell
published
2.87
Kathryn Ford
published
2.72
Amanda Cash
published 3
2.71
Patti Glassner
published
Shanin Russell
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catherine Hensley
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Rebecca Drendel
43W–52L career · 5 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Haley Timperio
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
Katie Cox
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Sandra Schulte
16W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Torey Parsons
48W–61L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Jennifer Farrell
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.90
Kathryn Ford
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Amanda Cash
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Patti Glassner
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Shanin Russell
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.