Teams

Super Women 65s

2024 65 & Over League · Women 7.0 - 65 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MONTANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-08-06vs Big Sky WomenLost 12
L#1 DoublesJudith Duryea / Dwanna Landrum vs Marie Neergaard / Ritva Porter1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesBeth Groshens / Elizabeth Orser vs Julie Shaw / Karen Vinton3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesGatchina Hessler / Mary Dell Joyner vs DIANA RAIMONDO / Nora Miller7-5, 6-2
2024-08-05vs Big Sky WomenLost 12
L#1 DoublesGatchina Hessler / Mary Dell Joyner vs Ritva Porter / Marie Neergaard1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDebbie Gould / Elizabeth Orser vs Arianna Whitman / Julie Shaw3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJudith Duryea / Mary Gail Sullivan vs Cyndy Desin / DIANA RAIMONDO6-2, 7-6
2024-08-05vs Big Sky WomenLost 12
L#1 DoublesDwanna Landrum / Judith Duryea vs Ann Chrisler / Ritva Porter2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesGatchina Hessler / Mary Dell Joyner vs Arianna Whitman / Karen Vinton5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGlenna Hageman / Jean Clary vs Nora Miller / Cheryl Scott7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2024-08-05vs Big Sky WomenLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Dell Joyner / Elizabeth Orser vs Ann Chrisler / DIANA RAIMONDO1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesGlenna Hageman / Jean Clary vs Nora Miller / Cheryl Scott4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJudith Duryea / Mary Gail Sullivan vs Cyndy Desin / Karen Vinton3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 7.0 - 65 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Big Sky Women4084993
2Super Women 65s044818137

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Gatchina Hessler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Beth Groshens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Debbie Gould
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Dwanna Landrum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Orser
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Glenna Hageman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jean Clary
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Judith Duryea
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Dell Joyner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Mary Gail Sullivan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Dell Joyner + Gatchina Hessler123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gatchina Hessler
41W–50L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Beth Groshens
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Debbie Gould
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Dwanna Landrum
19W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Elizabeth Orser
2W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Glenna Hageman
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jean Clary
32W–14L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Judith Duryea
13W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Dell Joyner
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Gail Sullivan
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.