Teams

HG GOLD

2021 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-09-16vs CACI BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Garside / Alison Finley vs Stacey Anderson / Jodi Little2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSandra Stephenson vs Karina Stevens2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKristi Piazza / Diane Vartuli vs Somsi Stringer / Angela Rose6-2, 7-6
2021-09-02vs LTFC NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Sanders / Kelly Weber vs Kim Sullivan / Kari Miceli2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDiane Vartuli vs Amanda Meier6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKristin Morris / Nicole Nies vs Ashley Agrelius / Melissa Blake4-6, 5-7
2021-08-26vs WC ORANGEWon 21
L#1 DoublesKristi Piazza / Julie Sanders vs Doreen Rogers / Margaret Wilson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSandra Stephenson vs Kate Mayoss6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlison Finley / Julie Garside vs Jamelle Leyden / Andrea Milanovich6-1, 6-0
2021-08-19vs SSLGT BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesKristi Piazza / Paige Jones vs Jeni Anderson / Angie Lutterman6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDiane Vartuli vs Kristen Ryan1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesClare Ambrose / Nicole Nies vs Patty Weston / Dominique Fauble6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2021-08-12vs LTFC PINKLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaige Jones / Kelly Weber vs Yvette Watson / Carla Gamet2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJulie Garside vs Annie Ross7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesClare Ambrose / Megann Rundell vs Valerie Koenig / Lauren Ford5-7, 3-6
2021-08-05vs KC YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlison Finley / Julie Garside vs Phyllis Glawe / Meghan Geisler6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSandra Stephenson vs Janet Weyhmiller6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKristin Morris / Nicole Nies vs Lauri Lehan / Debra West6-7, 4-6
2021-07-29vs HW BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristi Piazza / Julie Sanders vs Amy Kinney / Kathy Norford7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJulie Garside vs Molly Weiss6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPaige Jones / Lauren Rundell vs Carol Decker / Kami Guarino6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings19 teams · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BRMST SILVER7015617173
2VCC YELLOW6116515166
3SSLGT TEAL5216515154
4LTA GOLD43111023211
5CACM NAVY43101126192
6BCC NAVY3412919169
7LTA SILVER34111023190
8HG GOLD34101125179
9PH ORANGE34101126206
10SKY YELLOW3491227211
11PCRK NAVY34101127205
12LTFC PINK3491229215
13GTC ORANGE2591226213
14MEA TEAL2591228205
15LTFC NAVY2571429214
16WC ORANGE2581329201
17CHCC GRAY2561534226
18BTA PINK2551635230
19LEBTC YELLOW1641736216

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Julie Garside
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.81
Diane Vartuli
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Alison Finley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Paige Jones
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.76
Sandra Stephenson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.67
Kelly Weber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Kristi Piazza
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.51
Clare Ambrose
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Nicole Nies
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Megann Rundell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Lauren Rundell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Vartuli + Kristi Piazza11556% games+8.6% vs expected
Paige Jones + Julie Garside4452% games+5.7% vs expected
Kristi Piazza + Sandra Stephenson6253% games+1.8% vs expected
Diane Vartuli + Sandra Stephenson7260% games+1.5% vs expected
Megann Rundell + Kristi Piazza4246% games−4.9% vs expected
Diane Vartuli + Julie Garside5254% games−6.8% vs expected
Paige Jones + Kristi Piazza3543% games−9.4% vs expected
Megann Rundell + Clare Ambrose2641% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Garside
81W–62L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Diane Vartuli
78W–53L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.81
4
Alison Finley
64W–48L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
Paige Jones
34W–35L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
Sandra Stephenson
77W–43L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
Kelly Weber
8W–19L career · 2 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Kristi Piazza
61W–66L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Clare Ambrose
49W–71L career · type A · 2 lines in 2021
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Nicole Nies
70W–48L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Megann Rundell
28W–35L career · type S · 1 line in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.15
Lauren Rundell
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.