Teams

CACM BLUE

2025 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-11vs DTC YELLOWWon 30
W#1 DoublesInessa McGill / Stephanie Slaybaugh vs Ilene Vivinetto / Rebecca Wulliman6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Harlow-Irwin / Bobbie Turner vs Kathy Graveley / Julie Underdahl6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKristin Nelson / Stephanie Baur vs Linda Feiman / Deborah Yoder6-4, 6-1
2025-06-04vs CACM GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesCathy O'Neill / Nancy Harlow-Irwin vs Patricia Curry / Carrie Steuart7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMary Deluccia / Inessa McGill vs Kathryn Ague / Juli Bulloch6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesStephanie Slaybaugh / Bobbie Turner vs Kathy Bailey / Katherine Demong6-1, 6-4
2025-05-28vs DTC REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesKristin Nelson / Mary Deluccia vs Julie Snyder / Liz Donahue5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKris Staaf-Bendixen / Cathy O'Neill vs Kwai Kendall Grove / Allison Bookmyer6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesStephanie Slaybaugh / Bobbie Turner vs Nancy Alterman / Wendy Glazer6-4, 6-4
2025-05-23vs DTC YELLOWWon 30
W#1 DoublesCathy O'Neill / Nancy Harlow-Irwin vs Jody Hunnicutt / Sharon Kelly6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKristin Nelson / Mary Deluccia vs Kathleen Andrews / Karen Polzin6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Ruwe / Stephanie Slaybaugh vs Julie Underdahl / Susan Nakano6-4, 6-2
2025-05-21vs CP YELLOWWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristin Nelson / Cathy O'Neill vs Erika Vincent / Mary Ridgeway6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesInessa McGill / Stephanie Slaybaugh vs Lynn Kitt / Merry Logan6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Deluccia / Bobbie Turner vs Carol Bedin / Kathleen McKern1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-05-14vs GTC BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesCathy O'Neill / Nancy Harlow-Irwin vs Linda Thurman / Sanda McMillan6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKristin Nelson / Kris Staaf-Bendixen vs Valerie Imperial / Belinda Nelson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Ruwe / Inessa McGill vs Rebecca Gart / Katai Itta6-1, 6-1
2025-04-30vs CACM GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristin Nelson / Mary Deluccia vs Bev Morrow / Patricia Curry6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCathy O'Neill / Nancy Harlow-Irwin vs Karla Simons / Helen Wilson6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesStephanie Baur / Stephanie Slaybaugh vs Juli Bulloch / Carrie Steuart6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Cathy O'Neill
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Nancy Harlow-Irwin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.37
Stephanie Baur
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Kristin Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Stephanie Slaybaugh
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.25
Mary Deluccia
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.23
Kris Staaf-Bendixen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Bobbie Turner
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Inessa McGill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Karen Ruwe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bobbie Turner + Kristin Nelson2355% games+11.1% vs expected
Kris Staaf-Bendixen + Kristin Nelson8553% games+7.3% vs expected
Stephanie Baur + Kristin Nelson6458% games+6.8% vs expected
Bobbie Turner + Stephanie Slaybaugh5450% games+3.3% vs expected
Inessa McGill + Stephanie Slaybaugh7254% games+3.2% vs expected
Mary Deluccia + Kristin Nelson4349% games+1.4% vs expected
Mary Deluccia + Kris Staaf-Bendixen2349% gamesnot enough data
Mary Deluccia + Inessa McGill123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cathy O'Neill
52W–33L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Nancy Harlow-Irwin
40W–45L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
Stephanie Baur
87W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
Kristin Nelson
115W–102L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Stephanie Slaybaugh
72W–71L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Mary Deluccia
149W–104L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Kris Staaf-Bendixen
53W–51L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Bobbie Turner
43W–55L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Inessa McGill
70W–59L career · 4 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Karen Ruwe
125W–144L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.