Teams

CCP CAUWELS/MCCLENDON

2025 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Friday Ladies 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-25vs RC KEIPERSplit 11
W#2 DoublesPatti Hart / Tracy Groves vs Kim Keiper / Lynne Maddox6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLynn Jumper / Ruth Strong vs Camille Brown / Melissa Greenhill2-6, 3-6
2025-04-11vs RTC MELVILLELost 02
L#1 DoublesGayla Collins / Gayle Landers vs Laurie Schneider / Sue Phillips3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTere Martin / Ruth Strong vs Misty Gober / Edith Kruckmann3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-04-08vs HV TONTISplit 11
L#2 DoublesDiane Cauwels / Andrea Rhodes vs Karen Tonti / Christy Hart6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRita Hudson / Tere Martin vs Cary Crawford / Gina Johnson7-6, 6-3
2025-04-03vs WAG STIMMELWon 10
W#2 DoublesDiane Cauwels / Andrea Rhodes vs Summer Richbourg / Cindy Lucio7-5, 7-6
2025-03-14vs CHS RICE/SCHULTZLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiane Cauwels / Gayla Collins vs Cindy Pappous / Kaylea Schultz0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesTere Martin / Deanna Williams vs Julie Evans / Jenna Xiong7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLynn Jumper / Ruth Strong vs Shailaja Malani / Alissa McKinney6-7, 2-6
2025-03-07vs CCC YEAGERLost 02
L#2 DoublesGayla Collins / Diane Cauwels vs Leslie Palmer / Leigh Sheppard6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLynn Jumper / Rita Hudson vs Rachel Gralapp / Ashley McClure4-6, 5-7
2025-02-28vs RTC ALBUSSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPatti Hart / Kim Kerby-Dickman vs Lori Mcwhorter / Kera Watts6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTere Martin / Ruth Strong vs Teresa Albus / Kimberly Grogan6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2025-02-27vs RC KEIPERLost 03
L#1 DoublesGayla Collins / Diane Cauwels vs Kim Keiper / Lynne Maddox1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTere Martin / Debbie McLendon vs Averi Goff / Jenea Stone3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAngela Rosenbaum / Lynn Jumper vs Wesley Snyder / Marnie Pizzitola3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · Friday Ladies 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RTC ALBUS8032819253
2RC KEIPER71261433321
3CCC PRINCE/KALE71271333314
4WAG HOLLAND62241638322
5RTC MELVILLE53261436326
6RTC CURTIS53251536339
7CHS RICE/SCHULTZ53241639366
8RTC NORTHCUTT44182248373
9CCC GRALAPP44172350372
10RID HARBUCK44182250371
11BIR HENDERSON/CURLEY26192148383
12HV TONTI26142654408
13TRO BLAKE26162454395
14TCU HUBER17122857415
15CCP CAUWELS/MCCLENDON0893163431

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Patti Hart
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.74
Gayle Landers
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Andrea Rhodes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Tracy Groves
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Debbie McLendon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Angela Rosenbaum
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Kim Kerby-Dickman
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.52
Lynn Jumper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Rita Hudson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
REGINA RIVERA
usually #2 Singles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
3.48
Ruth Strong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Diane Cauwels
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.45
Gayla Collins
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.35
Judy Johnson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Tere Martin
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ruth Strong + Lynn Jumper6455% games−1.9% vs expected
Tracy Groves + Patti Hart6260% games−2.6% vs expected
Gayla Collins + Diane Cauwels1930% games−14.8% vs expected
Tracy Groves + Ruth Strong123 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Groves + Lynn Jumper213 matchesnot enough data
Debbie McLendon + Gayle Landers123 matchesnot enough data
Rita Hudson + Gayla Collins033 matchesnot enough data
Kim Kerby-Dickman + Gayle Landers213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patti Hart
15W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Gayle Landers
9W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Andrea Rhodes
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
Tracy Groves
15W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.67
4
Debbie McLendon
9W–24L career · 6 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Angela Rosenbaum
11W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.58
Kim Kerby-Dickman
11W–24L career · 6 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
Lynn Jumper
25W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Rita Hudson
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
REGINA RIVERA
24W–48L career · 7 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
Ruth Strong
12W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.48
4
Diane Cauwels
8W–20L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
4
Gayla Collins
3W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45
Judy Johnson
3W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.35
Tere Martin
3W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.