Teams

Lee, Chris

2025 Adult 55 & Over-JXN · Men 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-13vs Pace, PhillipWon 10
W#1 DoublesLane Clower / Wade Burke vs Jeffrey Martin / Mitch Wolverton6-1, 6-3
2025-04-09vs Pace, PhillipWon 20
W#1 DoublesEasy Biedenharn / Charles Hudspeth vs Phillip Pace / Mitch Wolverton6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChris Lee / Ken Barnett vs Mitch Stentiford / Jeffrey Martin6-3, 6-4
2025-03-30vs Pace, PhillipWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlan Hargett / Ken Barnett vs Mitch Stentiford / Bill Alvis6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPaige Purvis / Charles Hudspeth vs Stanley Jenkins / Jeffrey Martin6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEasy Biedenharn / Michael Pinson vs Phillip Pace / Tommy Taylor6-1, 6-2
2025-03-23vs Pace, PhillipWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Lee / James Vining vs Tommy Taylor / Greg Williamson6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichael Pinson / Alan Hargett vs Stan Fisher / Jeffrey Martin6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMitch Rayborn / Paige Purvis vs Bill Alvis / Byron Galloway6-4, 6-2
2025-03-16vs Pace, PhillipWon 21
W#1 DoublesChris Lee / Wade Burke vs Bill Alvis / Mitch Wolverton6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMark Howard / Lane Clower vs Mitch Stentiford / Jeffrey Martin7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKelly Lee / James Vining vs Phillip Pace / Stanley Jenkins4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-03-02vs Pace, PhillipWon 30
W#1 DoublesChris Lee / Wade Burke vs Greg Williamson / Jeffrey Martin7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMitch Rayborn / Mark Howard vs Phillip Pace / Bill Alvis6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLane Clower / Glenn Summers vs Stanley Jenkins / Tommy Taylor6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Men 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lee, Chris60162497

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Mitch Rayborn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.82
Ken Barnett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Alan Hargett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Michael Pinson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Lane Clower
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.60
James Vining
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Paige Purvis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.45
Charles Hudspeth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.40
Easy Biedenharn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Glenn Summers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Wade Burke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Easy Biedenharn + Michael Pinson314 matchesnot enough data
Easy Biedenharn + Charles Hudspeth224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mitch Rayborn
19W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
Ken Barnett
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Alan Hargett
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Pinson
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.70
Lane Clower
34W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
James Vining
12W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
Paige Purvis
40W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
4
Charles Hudspeth
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
Easy Biedenharn
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.40
Glenn Summers
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Wade Burke
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.