Teams

DANVILLE TC/PLEASANTON 18AW3.5D

2021 ADULT 18 & Over · Women's 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Heidi Olson
published 4
3.69
Linda Choi
published
3.44
Helen Yang
published 3.5
3.38
Regina Hughes
published
3.34
Julie Golinski
published
3.26
Julia Petrov
published
Betsy Gwynn
published 3.5
3.16
Betsy Kemp
published 3.5
3.11
Michelle Weiss
published
3.10
Mendy Gonzales
published
2.92
Jan Lipnicke
published
2.85
Malou Matthew
published
2.83
Fedwa Booth
published 3
2.82
Dana Brent
published 3
2.67
Elaine Marshall
published 3
Mary Akli
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Regina Hughes + Julie Golinski11359% games+6.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Heidi Olson
7W–7L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
Linda Choi
28W–15L career · no lines in 2021
<1%8%92%
3.69
3.5
Helen Yang
8W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%68%32%
3.44
Regina Hughes
36W–26L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.38
Julie Golinski
20W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
3.34
Julia Petrov
11W–9L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Betsy Gwynn
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Betsy Kemp
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
Michelle Weiss
13W–13L career · no lines in 2021
19%80%<1%
3.11
Mendy Gonzales
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.10
Jan Lipnicke
10W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
2.92
Malou Matthew
7W–15L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Fedwa Booth
12W–23L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Dana Brent
14W–18L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Elaine Marshall
8W–12L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
2.67
Mary Akli
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.