Teams

Kuebert/Ayers 18s 3.0W Fri AM

2026 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 3.0 18 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-05-01vs Olalere 18s 3.0W Fri AMWon 21
W#1 DoublesCatherine Johnstone / Kristin Gile vs Stephanie Deaver / Shelly Penumalli6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Lovett / Sandra Simpkins vs Angela Olalere / Christi Womble6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKaye Ferree / Suzi Cook vs Melisa Lyles / Kathryn Roberts3-6, 4-6
2026-04-24vs Benfield/Holtzman 18s 3.0W Fri AMLost 14
L#1 DoublesCatherine Johnstone / Lindsey Blackwell vs Allison Garrett / Kerry Spears1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesSammie Jo McCluskey vs Jennifer Newkirk7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSandra Simpkins / Jill van Veen vs Heather Hill / Laura Loftin2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKylie Roy vs Courtney OShea5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSuzi Cook / Whitney Kuebert vs Joanna Ashe / Frannie Benfield1-6, 0-6
2026-04-17vs Tuhro/Curley 18s 3.0W Fri AMLost 23
L#1 DoublesCatherine Johnstone / Jennifer Ayers vs Alexis Ganesh / Janess Reyna2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSammie Jo McCluskey vs Misty Hilliard0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Lovett / Whitney Kuebert vs Rebecca Sheppard / Ashley Jamison5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKylie Roy vs Shannon Smith2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTori Swanson / Kaye Ferree vs Cassidy MacKay / Monica Billingsley3-6, 0-6
2026-04-10vs Olalere 18s 3.0W Fri AMLost 12
L#1 DoublesCatherine Johnstone / Sarah Lovett vs Mary Chandler Batchelor / Rebecca Sheaff6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJennifer Ayers vs Kathryn Roberts6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSandra Simpkins / Jill van Veen vs Melisa Lyles / Amy Stehlin5-7, 5-7
2026-04-03vs Benfield/Holtzman 18s 3.0W Fri AMLost 04
L#1 DoublesKristin Gile / Sarah Lovett vs Annetta Bartle / Joanna Ashe6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKylie Roy vs Caroline Walker1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Ayers / Whitney Kuebert vs Erica Worth / Della Crone3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesTammy Milani vs Ashley Vartanian0-6, 1-6
2026-03-27vs Tuhro/Curley 18s 3.0W Fri AMLost 14
L#1 DoublesJennifer Ayers / Kristin Gile vs Shelly Tuhro / Ginger Ballard0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCatherine Johnstone vs Monica Billingsley4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWhitney Kuebert / Lindsey Blackwell vs Liz Busch / Tara Rusiewicz1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSammie Jo McCluskey vs Alexis Ganesh1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTori Swanson / Sandra Simpkins vs Margo Rossato / Evie Curley3-6, 5-7
2026-03-20vs Olalere 18s 3.0W Fri AMWon 31
W#1 DoublesCatherine Johnstone / Jennifer Ayers vs Gail Little / Christi Womble6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSammie Jo McCluskey vs Corinne Kendall6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTori Swanson / Kaye Ferree vs Amy Stehlin / Melisa Lyles6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRachel Hunsucker vs Rebecca Sheaff1-6, 1-6
2026-03-13vs Benfield/Holtzman 18s 3.0W Fri AMLost 13
W#1 DoublesKristin Gile / Sammie Jo McCluskey vs Frannie Benfield / Ashley Vartanian1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKylie Roy vs Allison Garrett1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Ayers / Lindsey Blackwell vs Della Crone / Erica Worth1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSandra Simpkins / Jill van Veen vs Annetta Bartle / Laura Loftin3-6, 2-6
2026-03-06vs Tuhro/Curley 18s 3.0W Fri AMLost 23
L#1 DoublesLindsey Blackwell / Tori Swanson vs Shelly Tuhro / Misty Hilliard1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCatherine Johnstone vs Monica Billingsley5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTammy Milani / Sarah Lovett vs Rebecca Sheppard / Ashley Jamison4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesSammie Jo McCluskey vs Shannon Smith7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWhitney Kuebert / Rachel Hunsucker vs Leigh Westbrook / Tara Rusiewicz0-6, 5-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · WOMEN 3.0 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Benfield/Holtzman 18s 3.0W Fri AM81311432312
2Davis/Choros 18s 3.0W Wed PM7134615216
3Profitt/Brown 18s 3.0W Wed PM71291124269
4Tuhro/Curley 18s 3.0W Fri AM72321329275
5Falls/Howell 18s 3.0W Wed PM62281229274
6Siesling/Dixon 18s 3.0W Wed PM35231739307
7Vaughn 18s 3.0W Wed PM35172350353
8Arnett/Michael 18s 3.0W Wed PM35152553382
9Kuebert/Ayers 18s 3.0W Fri AM36202556391
10Tucker 18s 3.0W Wed PM2693167436
11Barnes 18s 3.0W Wed PM1753572442
12Olalere 18s 3.0W Fri AM0973877499

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Sammie Jo McCluskey
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.95
Catherine Johnstone
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.94
Kristin Gile
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Jennifer Ayers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Sarah Lovett
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.73
Lindsey Blackwell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.70
Kylie Roy
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.63
Suzi Cook
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Tori Swanson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.61
Sandra Simpkins
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.60
Tammy Milani
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.60
Jill van Veen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.52
Whitney Kuebert
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.34
Kaye Ferree
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rachel Hunsucker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sammie Jo McCluskey + Catherine Johnstone8071% games+12.5% vs expected
Kristin Gile + Catherine Johnstone314 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Lovett + Catherine Johnstone123 matchesnot enough data
Jill van Veen + Sandra Simpkins033 matchesnot enough data
Tori Swanson + Catherine Johnstone123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sammie Jo McCluskey
34W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Catherine Johnstone
34W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
Kristin Gile
19W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Jennifer Ayers
37W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%77%22%
2.89
Sarah Lovett
7W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Lindsey Blackwell
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Kylie Roy
4W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.70
Suzi Cook
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
Tori Swanson
9W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Sandra Simpkins
11W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
Tammy Milani
32W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%24%76%
2.60
Jill van Veen
1W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
Whitney Kuebert
6W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
Kaye Ferree
2W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.34
Rachel Hunsucker
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.